Owyhee Motorcycle Club, Inc. v. Ada County

Citation855 P.2d 47,123 Idaho 962
Decision Date10 June 1993
Docket NumberNo. 19773,19773
PartiesIn the Matter of the Appeal of Owyhee Motorcycle Club, from the Board of Equalization of Ada County for Tax Year 1989. OWYHEE MOTORCYCLE CLUB, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. ADA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, and the Ada County Commissioners sitting as the Board of Equalization, Respondents. Boise, January 1993 Term
CourtIdaho Supreme Court

Greg H. Bower, Ada County Pros. Atty. and Eric T. Krening, Deputy Pros. Atty., Boise, for respondents. Eric T. Krening argued.

TROUT, Justice.

I. BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

In this case, the Owyhee Motorcycle Club (OMC) claims tax exempt status as a non-profit charitable organization organized for the purpose of promoting the recreational use of motorcycles.

OMC was founded in 1939, and in 1943, purchased eighty acres in Ada County which are the subject of this action. Approximately forty of the eighty acres are too steep to use. On the remaining acreage OMC operates three types of motorcycle race tracks. OMC sponsors races on these tracks fifty to sixty times a year.

In 1989 OMC generated $112,000.00 in gross income from fees charged to spectators and race participants. In addition, OMC estimates that its members donate about $46,000 in time and equipment each year. The Club does not receive any substantial donations from outside its membership. OMC retains a marginal profit and does not have any paid employees.

In 1989, OMC charged the general public a fee of two dollars for ages twelve and under and five dollars for all others who wished to watch the races. If members of the general public chose to participate in the races, they paid a gate fee of five dollars plus a competition fee of ten to twenty dollars per race. OMC members did not have to pay the gate fee when participating in the races, although they paid the same competition fee as non-members. Members who only wished to watch the races paid a reduced gate fee of two dollars. In 1989, single membership dues were thirty dollars and family memberships dues were forty dollars per year. OMC had fifty-one charter members who did not pay dues. All fees were used to maintain the tracks and other race facilities.

OMC members have the privilege of using the property for dirt-bike riding on days when there are no races. The general public does not have access to the OMC property other than as spectators or participants on race days. Before 1989, OMC did not have any provision in its articles of incorporation for the allocation of the property in the event of dissolution. After questioning at the Board of Equalization hearing, OMC amended its articles to provide that the Club's assets would be distributed In 1989, Ada County reassessed the taxable status of properties in the county and decided the land owned by OMC should be taxed. OMC appealed to the Board of Equalization and the Board of Tax Appeals, both of which affirmed the decision to tax the property. OMC then appealed to the district court which conducted a trial de novo. Both parties stipulated to the factual findings of the Board of Tax Appeals and moved for summary judgment. The district judge granted summary judgment in favor of Ada County and OMC appealed to this Court.

[123 Idaho 964] to the Idaho Department of Recreation upon dissolution.

II. OMC DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR A CHARITABLE EXEMPTION UNDER I.C. § 63-105C

Although OMC provides a form of community service by offering recreational opportunities, OMC members, not the general public, benefit most from OMC's services. Considering the provisions of I.C. § 63-105C and prior case law, we agree with the trial court that OMC does not qualify for tax exempt status as a charitable organization.

This case presents a mixed question of fact and law. The interpretation of I.C. § 63-105C and the requirements for a charitable exemption are questions of law for which this Court takes de novo review. Boise Cent. Trades & Labor Council v. Board of Ada County, 122 Idaho 67, 831 P.2d 535 (1992). The issue of fact is whether the activities of OMC meet the requirements for a charitable exemption. Bogus Basin Recreational Ass'n, Inc. v. Boise County Bd. of Equalization, 118 Idaho 686, 688, 799 P.2d 974, 976 (1990). Where both parties move for summary judgment on the same stipulated facts, the standard is whether the record is sufficient to justify the district court's findings. Boise Cent. Trades, 122 Idaho at 69-70, 831 P.2d at 537-38.

Idaho Code § 63-105C is a general provision which grants tax exempt status to "[p]roperty belonging to any fraternal, benevolent, or charitable corporation or society...." We have interpreted this provision broadly stating that charity is not limited to providing monetary aid to the needy. Appeal of Sunny Ridge Manor, Inc., 106 Idaho 98, 100, 675 P.2d 813, 815 (1984). "The word 'charitable,' in a legal sense, includes every gift for general public use, whether it be for educational, religious, physical or social benefit." Id. (citations omitted). However, tax exemptions are never presumed and statutes granting such exemptions will be strictly construed against the taxpayer. Bogus Basin, 118 Idaho at 687, 799 P.2d at 975. Furthermore, a non-profit organization is not entitled to property tax exemption merely because it provides some services to the general public. Id.

A charitable organization must provide some type of general public benefit. Coeur d'Alene Pub. Golf Club, Inc. v. Kootenai Bd. of Equalization, 106 Idaho 104, 675 P.2d 819 (1984). We have explained that there are a number of factors to consider in determining charitable status, some of which bear on the issue of public benefit:

(1) the stated purposes of its undertaking, (2) whether its functions are charitable ..., (3) whether it is supported by donations, (4) whether the recipients of its services are required to pay for the assistance they receive, (5) whether there is general public benefit, (6) whether the income received produces a profit, (7) to whom the assets would go upon dissolution of the corporation, and (8) whether the "charity" provided is based on need.

Sunny Ridge, 106 Idaho at 100, 675 P.2d at 815. Charitable status is an individual matter to be decided on a case by case basis. Id. This is not an exclusive list of factors and some of the listed factors may not apply in every case. Id. As a starting point for our determination we will examine each of the factors set forth above.

A. THE STATED PURPOSE OF ITS UNDERTAKING AND WHETHER ITS FUNCTIONS ARE CHARITABLE

Under certain circumstances, the recreational services offered by OMC may be

                [123 Idaho 965] considered charitable.  Providing for recreation is a community service, which, if other factors are present, may be a charitable activity.  See Sunny Ridge, 106 Idaho at 101, 675 P.2d at 816.   OMC's stated purpose is to promote the recreational use of motorcycles.  Functionally, OMC provides such recreational use by sponsoring motorcycle races and providing a place where some can ride for pleasure.  While promoting the recreational use of motorcycles probably does not comport with traditional notions of "charitable activities," under the broader definitions we have previously adopted, it is possible to find some benefit to the community.  Whether motorcycling is a recreational activity is not the only consideration, however, and we must determine whether any of the other charitable factors are present
                
B. WHETHER IT IS SUPPORTED BY DONATIONS

OMC does not receive substantial outside donations which work to the benefit of the general public. This Court considers outside donations to be an important charitable factor because it reduces the cost to the general public. Sunny Ridge, 106 Idaho at 101, 675 P.2d at 916; Coeur d'Alene Pub. Golf Club, 106 Idaho at 107, 675 P.2d at 822. The donations in the present case are from members of OMC in the form of donated time and equipment. In return for the donated time, members receive benefits from OMC in the form of reduced admission fees and the opportunity to use OMC property for dirt-bike riding on non-race days. Considering the facts before this Court, OMC has not shown that the general public receives a direct benefit from the donations of the club members.

C. WHETHER THE RECIPIENTS OF ITS SERVICES ARE REQUIRED TO PAY FOR THE ASSISTANCE THEY RECEIVE

OMC charges a fee for its services. This factor is of great importance and should be weighed accordingly. Sunny Ridge, 106 Idaho at 102, 675 P.2d at 817. Fees which are remunerative in character indicate that the activity is not charitable, although a number of jurisdictions have held that cost-free assistance is not required. Id. It is important, though, that the charges be nominal, or at least not commensurate with the benefits provided. Id.

There is no dispute that OMC charges a fee to those watching and participating in motorcycle races. Most of OMC's operational costs, over $100,000 in 1989, were generated from fees charged to spectators and participants. The general public pays more than nominal fees including five dollars for admission and as much as twenty dollars per race to participate in the races. Where, as here, the fees charged are sufficient to cover much of the current operating expenses it is difficult to view this as charitable. For these reasons, the fees charged for services in this case indicate that OMC is not a charitable organization.

D. WHETHER THERE IS GENERAL PUBLIC BENEFIT

OMC does not provide a general public benefit for the purposes of I.C. § 63-105C. The question presented by this factor is whether the organization fulfills a need which the government might otherwise be required to fill. Sunny Ridge, 106 Idaho at 102, 675 P.2d at 817. Even though only a limited number of people actually receive a benefit from the services provided, the organization may still be seen as...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Housing Southwest, Inc. v. Washington County
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1996
    ... ... Owyhee Motorcycle Club, Inc. v. Ada County, 123 Idaho 962, 964, 855 P.2d 47, 49 (1993). Statutes granting ... ...
  • Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Soc'y v. Bd. of Equal. of Ada Cnty.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 21, 2016
    ... ... Petitioner-Respondent,v.BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF ADA COUNTY, Respondent-Appellant.Docket No. 43697/43698Supreme Court ... this Court exercises free review." Housing Southwest Inc. v. Washington Cnty. , 128 Idaho 335, 337, 913 P.2d 68, 70 (1996) (citing Owyhee Motorcycle Club, Inc. v. Ada Cnty. , 123 Idaho 962, 964, ... ...
  • Kimbrough v. Idaho Bd. of Tax Appeals (In re Kimbrough)
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • February 4, 2011
    ... ... & Judith Kimbrough, from the Decision of the Canyon County Board of Equalization for the Tax Year 2007.Walter ... Housing Sw., Inc. v. Washington Cnty., 128 Idaho 335, 337, 913 P.2d 68, 70 1996) (citing Owyhee Motorcycle Club, Inc. v. Ada Cnty., 123 Idaho 962, 964, 855 ... ...
  • Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Soc'y v. Bd. of Equal. of Ada Cnty., Docket No. 43697
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 21, 2016
    ... ... BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF ADA COUNTY, Respondent-Appellant.Docket No. 43697Docket No. 436982016 ... this Court exercises free review." Housing Southwest Inc. v. Washington Cnty., 128 Idaho 335, 337, 913 P.2d 68, 70 1996) (citing Owyhee Motorcycle Club, Inc. v. Ada Cnty., 123 Idaho 962, 964, 855 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT