P & O Mach. Works, Inc. v. Pollard, 42497
| Decision Date | 25 January 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 3,No. 42497,42497,3 |
| Citation | P & O Mach. Works, Inc. v. Pollard, 153 S.E.2d 631, 115 Ga.App. 96 (Ga. App. 1967) |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Parties | P & O MACHINE WORKS, INC. v. C. P. POLLARD |
Richard T. Cowan, Savannah, for appellant.
Robert E. Falligant, Savannah, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
1. While parol evidence, even though admitted without objection, of agreements and stipulations made prior to the execution of the written instrument has no probative value so as to alter or vary its terms (Cleghorn v. Shields, 165 Ga. 362, 141 S.E. 55), parol evidence is admissible to prove a new and distinct subsequent agreement (Code § 38-507) or modification of the original agreement (Covington v. Brewer, 101 Ga.App. 724, 115 S.E.2d 368), provided it is supported by a consideration. Wimberly v. Tanner, 34 Ga.App. 313(1), 129 S.E. 306; Collier Estate v. Murray, 145 Ga. 851(1), 90 S.E. 52; Long Tobacco Harvesting Co. v. Brannen, 98 Ga.App. 142, 149, 105 S.E.2d 390.
2. Plaintiff sold the defendant a business, the bill of sale including 'all assets' and 'all materials in stock.' There were at the time physically on the premises certain materials which had been specially ordered by the seller for fabrication into splined shafts to be made to the specifications of Owen-Richards Company, a purchaser, and which materials were not regularly kept in stock. This order and others were incomplete at the time of the sale of the business. According to the testimony of the plaintiff and another witness, it was agreed by the parties that the seller would remain on until he had completed the pending contracts. He remained for about a month, finishing 25 or 30 contracts. It became apparent to him that he would be unable to finish the Owen-Richards contract by the time shafts were demanded; he thereupon entered into a parol agreement with the defendant's agent that...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Bank Bldg. & Equipment Corp. of America v. Georgia State Bank
...or new agreement (see Smith v. Newton, 59 Ga. 113(5); Phelps v. Belle Isle, 29 Ga.App. 571(3), 116 S.E. 217; P. & O. Machine Works v. Pollard, 115 Ga.App. 96(1), 153 S.E.2d 631), and it is clear that the minutes have reference only to the work to be performed under the original contracts wh......
-
Lyon v. Patterson
...125, 126 S.E.2d 641; General Acceptance Corporation v. Nix Ford, Inc., 107 Ga.App. 32, 33, 129 S.E.2d 202; P. & O. Machine Works, Inc. v. Pollard, 115 Ga.App. 96, 153 S.E.2d 631; Claxton v. Pullman, Inc., 116 Ga.App. 416, 418, 157 S.E.2d 642; Waters v. Lanier, 116 Ga.App. 471, 474, 157 S.E.......
-
Houston v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co., 44197
...the modification requires a new consideration. Phelps v. Belle Isle, 29 Ga.App. 571(3), 116 S.E. 217; P. & O. Machine Works, Inc. v. Pollard, 115 Ga.App. 96(1), 153 S.E.2d 631; Wynn, Shannon & Co. v. Cox, 5 Ga. 373; Smith v. Newton, 59 Ga. 113(5). As pointed out in Long Tobacco Harvesting C......
-
Giant Peanut & Grain Co., Inc. v. Long Mfg. Co., Inc.
...rule that parties to a written contract may modify that contract or make a subsequent contract by parol. P. O Machine Works, Inc. v. Pollard, 115 Ga.App. 96, 153 S.E.2d 631; Evans v. Henson, 73 Ga.App. 494, 37 S.E.2d 164. Long apparently denies that there was any oral agreement at all under......