A. P. Smith Mfg. Co. v. Court of Common Pleas of Essex County

Decision Date09 June 1930
Docket NumberNo. 216.,216.
Citation150 A. 771
PartiesA. P. SMITH MFG. CO v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ESSEX COUNTY et al.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Benjamin Kass, claimant, and opposed by the A. P. Smith Manufacturing Company, employer. To review a judgment of the court of common pleas, reversing an order of a commissioner of the Workmen's Compensation Bureau which dismissed claimant's petition for a rehearing, the employer brings certiorari.

Affirmed.

Argued October term, 1930, before TREN CHARD, LLOYD, and CASE, JJ.

Edwards & Smith, of Jersey City (Edwin F. Smith and Raymond Dawson, both of Jersey City, of counsel), for prosecutor.

John V. Laddey, of Newark, for respondent Kass.

LLOYD, J.

A writ of certiorari was allowed in this case to review the action of the common pleas court in reversing an order of a commissioner of the Compensation Bureau, which order dismissed the petition of Benjamin Kass for a rehearing of an award which had been adjusted eleven years before. Petitioner had an injury to the leg in 1916, and filed his petition in the Essex common pleas for compensation. On May 4, 1917, an award was made on this petition for the sum of $798.25, and a further sum of $10 per week for a period of 43 weeks. The order thus made was complied with and no payments had been made within the nine years preceding the filing of the petition in the present proceeding. In the application now being considered, it is claimed that there has been an increase of incapacity; that the injured leg, subsequent to the filing of the petition, was amputated in consequence of the injuries received in 1916.

During the period of Kass' employment, the original Workmen's Compensation Act of 1911 (P. L. p. 134) was in force and section 21 of that act provided: "An agreement or award of compensation may be modified at any time by a subsequent agreement, or at any time after one year from the time when the same became operative it may be reviewed upon the application of either party on the ground that the incapacity of the injured employee has subsequently increased or diminished."

In 1919, this section (P. L. p. 211, § 8) was amended to the following effect: "(f) An agreement or award of compensation may be modified at any time by a subsequent agreement, or reviewed upon the application of either party on the ground that the incapacity of the injured employee has subsequently increased or diminished."

By the same act section 23 of the Act of 1911 (P. L. 1919, p. 214, § 9) was amended respecting the limitation of time within which claims could be presented as follows: "(h) In case of personal injury or death all claims for compensation on account thereof shall be forever barred unless a petition is filed in duplicate with the secretary of the Workmen's Compensation Bureau, at the State House, in Trenton, within one year after the date on which the accident occurred, or in case an agreement of compensation has been made between such employer and such claimant, then within one year after the failure of the employer to make payment pursuant to the terms of such agreement; or in case a part of the compensation has been paid by such employer, then within one year after the last payment of compensation."

The prosecutor under the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Mustanen v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 24 d2 Novembro d2 1936
    ... ... 1977 Supreme Court of Wyoming November 24, 1936 ... AL ... from the District Court, Lincoln County; H. R. CHRISTMAS, ... Proceedings ... Co., (N. J. Supp.) 95 A. 242; A. P. Smith Mfg. Co ... v. Court of C. P., 107 N.J.L. 38, ... Compensation act is in derogation of the common law, it is ... remedial legislation, and should ... P. Smith ... Mfg. Co. v. Court of Common Pleas, supra, the court discussed ... an amendment to ... ...
  • Baldwin, State Treasurer v. Scullion
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 24 d2 Novembro d2 1936
    ... ... v. SCULLION No. 1995 Supreme Court of Wyoming November 24, 1936 ... R ... to the District Court of Natrona County; C. D. MURANE, Judge ... Proceeding ... v. Corp., (N. Y.) 168 N.E. 442; Smith Company v ... Court, (N. J.) 150 A. 771; ... ...
  • Biglioli v. Durotest Corp., A--42
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 3 d1 Fevereiro d1 1958
    ...was made,' citing J. W. Ferguson Co. v. Seaman, 119 N.J.L. 575, 197 A. 245 (E. & A.1938); A. P. Smith Mfg. Co. v. Court of Common Pleas of Essex County, 107 N.J.L. 38, 150 A. 771 (Sup.Ct.1930); Erie Railroad Co. v. Callaway, 91 N.J.L. 32, 102 A. 6 (Sup.Ct.1917); Baur v. Court of Common Plea......
  • Van Saun v. Twp. Comm. of Pequannock Tp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 12 d4 Junho d4 1930
    ... ... et al ... Supreme Court of New Jersey ... June 12, 1930 ... of the Township of Pequannock, in the county of Morris, be and the same is hereby abolished ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT