P. v. Riles
Decision Date | 16 August 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 72-2509,72-2509 |
Citation | 502 F.2d 963 |
Parties | Larry P. et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Wilson RILES et al., Defendants-Appellants. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Daniel E. Collins, III (argued), Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants.
Michael S. Sorgen (argued), of San Francisco Neighborhood Legal Assistance Foundation, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before KOELSCH and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, 1 district judge.
This is an appeal from an order granting, in part, a motion for a preliminary injunction. 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1) gives us jurisdiction. The district judge's Order and Memorandum, which embodies his findings of fact and conclusions of law, are reported in P. v. Riles, N.D.Cal., 1972, 343 F.Supp. 1306. We affirm.
As will be seen from that report, the district judge granted only a part of the requested relief, and narrowly limited what he granted. 343 F.Supp. at 1314-1315.
Prendergast v. N.Y. Tel. Co., 1923, 262 U.S. 43, 50-51, 43 S.Ct. 466, 469, 67 L.Ed. 853. Accord: Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp., 1970, 311 U.S. 282, 290, 61 S.Ct. 229, 85 L.Ed. 189. In Washington Capitols Basketball Club, Inc. v. Barry, 9 Cir., 1969, 419 F.2d 472, 475-476, we said: Id. at 476.
In reviewing the district court's order, we also apply the principles stated by us in Sierra Club v. Hickel, 9 Cir., 1970, 433 F.2d 24, 33, aff'd, 1972, 405 U.S. 727, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 31 L.Ed.2d 636: 'In order to obtain such relief (viz. a preliminary injunction), . . . the plaintiff must establish a strong likelihood or 'reasonable certainty' that he will prevail on the merits at a final hearing . . ..
In addition, before such a writ should issue, the applicant must show that it will suffer irreparable injury. The court must balance the damage to both parties.' See also Allison v. Froehlke, 5 Cir., 1972, 470 F.2d 1123, 1126. We also have in mind that, as we said in Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc., 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 804 at 808, 809.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith
...rather than "prohibitive" relief, they must clearly establish that a change in the status quo is warranted. See Larry P. v. Riles, 502 F.2d 963, 965 (9th Cir. 1974). A. Coerced Signing of Voluntary Departure In seeking a preliminary injunction against INS coercion, plaintiffs submit that th......
-
Larry P. By Lucille P. v. Riles
...Larry P. v. Riles, 343 F.Supp. 1306 (N.D.Cal.1972). Defendants appealed from this judgment, which this court affirmed. Larry P. v. Riles, 502 F.2d 963 (9th Cir.1974). In August 1973 the State defendants asked for a three-judge court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2281. The district court rejec......
-
Lora v. Board of Ed. of City of New York, 75-C-917.
...of standardized tests found culturally and racially biased. Id. See also P. v. Riles, 343 F.Supp. 1306 (N.D.Cal.1973), aff'd, 502 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1974); D. Kirp, W. Buss, P. Kuriloff, "Legal Reform of Special Education: Empirical Studies and Procedural Proposals," 62 Cal.L.Rev. 40, 49-50......
-
American Horse Protection Ass'n, Inc. v. Frizzell
...F.2d 24, 33 (9th Cir. 1970), aff'd sub nom. Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 92 S.Ct. 1311, 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972); Larry P. v. Riles, 502 F.2d 963, 964 (9th Cir. 1974). Because the Court finds that plaintiff has not made a sufficient showing of the likelihood of success on the merits, t......