P.W. v. State
Decision Date | 13 August 1993 |
Citation | 625 So.2d 1207 |
Parties | P.W. v. STATE. CR 92-889. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Jon Spechalske, Mobile, for appellant.
James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Jean Therkelsen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Seventeen-year-old P.W., the appellant, was adjudicated a serious juvenile offender pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 12-15-71.1, on the underlying charges of theft of property, burglary of a motor vehicle, and possession of burglar's tools. He was ordered committed to the Alabama Department of Youth Services for evaluation and placement.
The juvenile asserts on appeal that he should not have been ordered to pay court costs and fines in the amount of $1,494 because he is an indigent. At the hearing on the instant petitions, the juvenile admitted that he had been to juvenile court 28 times, and that prior to this proceeding he had accumulated $1,065 in court costs and/or restitution none of which had been paid. At the end of the hearing the juvenile judge stated:
In an order entered February 8, 1993, the juvenile court stated:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
D.D.A. v. State
...are required [to preserve an issue for appellate review]. See Ex parte Brown, 540 So.2d 740, 744-45 (Ala.1989)." P.W. v. State, 625 So.2d 1207, 1209 (Ala.Cr.App.1993). The appellant contends that the issues in his appeal should be "reviewed according to the plain error exception" because th......
-
Dixon v. State
...incarcerated for inability to pay a fine or court costs or restitution." Rule 26.11(i)(2), Ala. R.Crim. P. See also P.W. v. State, 625 So.2d 1207, 1210 (Ala.Crim.App.1993) ("`[T]he imprisonment of an indigent offender for failure to pay his fine is generally recognized as constitutionally i......
-
R.L.B. v. State
...are required [to preserve an issue for appellate review]. See Ex parte Brown, 540 So.2d 740, 744-45 (Ala.1989)." P.W. v. State, 625 So.2d 1207, 1209 (Ala.Cr.App.1993). "At no time during the transfer hearing or in A.H.'s motion for reconsideration did A.H. or defense counsel object to the c......
-
A.D.T. v. State
...are required [to preserve an issue for appellate review]. See Ex parte Brown, 540 So.2d 740, 744-45 (Ala.1989)." P.W. v. State, 625 So.2d 1207 (Ala.Cr.App.1993). In this case, there was evidence that A.D.T. had committed a first degree rape, which is a serious offense, and evidence that he ......