Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n

Docket NumberA142127
Decision Date16 June 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
31 cases
  • Bullseye Telecom, Inc. v. Cal. Pub. Utilities Comm'n
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 2021
    ...the decision has the burden of proving that it suffers from prejudicial error." ( Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Com. (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 812, 838, 188 Cal.Rptr.3d 374.) "Generally, we give presumptive value to a public agency's interpretation of a statute within its admi......
  • Weeks v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • October 7, 2015
    ...continuing ill effects from a past violation or a failure to correct a past wrong. See Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 237 Cal.App.4th 812, 855, 188 Cal.Rptr.3d 374 (2015).2. Discrimination FEHA "prohibits discrimination based on an employee's physical disability." Green v......
  • Marin Ass'n of Pub. Emps. v. Marin Cnty. Employees' Ret. Ass'n
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • August 17, 2016
    ...construed to avoid such absurd or outlandish consequences. (See Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Com . (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 812, 857, 188 Cal.Rptr.3d 374 and decisions cited.) We conclude that MCERA has not, in plaintiffs' words, “failed to follow the required procedure for ......
  • New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Pub. Utilities Comm'n of Cal.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • April 19, 2016
    ...the decision has the burden of proving that it suffers from prejudicial error." (Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Com. (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 812, 838, 188 Cal.Rptr.3d 374 ; see generally, City and County of San Francisco v. Public Utilities Com. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 523, 530, 2......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Real property torts
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books California Causes of Action
    • March 31, 2022
    ...Continuing A nuisance is continuing if it may be discontinued or abated at any time. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Pub. Utilities Comm’n , 188 Cal. Rptr. 3d 374 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015); see also Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp ., 12 Cal. 4th 1087, 1090, 1103, 51 Cal. Rptr. 2d 272, 273 (1996) (to pro......