Pace v. State of Alabama
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | FIELD |
| Citation | Pace v. State of Alabama, 106 U.S. 583, 1 S.Ct. 637, 27 L.Ed. 207 (1883) |
| Decision Date | 29 January 1883 |
| Parties | PACE v. STATE OF ALABAMA |
Section 4184 of the Code of Alabama provides that
Section 4189 of the same Code declares that 'if any white person and any negro, or the descendant of any negro to the third generation, inclusive, though one ancestor of each generation was a white person, intermarry or live in adultery or fornication with each other, each of them must, on conviction, be imprisoned in the penitentiary or sentenced to hard labor for the county for not less than two nor more than seven years.'
In November, 1881, the plaintiff in error, Tony Pace, a negro man, and Mary J. Cox, a white woman, were indicted under section 4189, in a circuit court of Alabama, for living together in a state of adultery or fornication, and were tried, convicted, and sentenced, each to two years' imprisonment in the state penitentiary. On appeal to the supreme court of the state the judgment was affirmed, and he brought the case here on writ of error, insisting that the act under which he was indicted and convicted is in conflict with the concluding clause of the first section of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution, which declares that no state shall 'deny to any person the equal protection of the laws.'
J. R. Tompkins, for plaintiff in error.
H. C. Tompkins, for defendant in error.
The counsel of the plaintiff in error compares sections 4184 and 4189 of the Code of Alabama, and assuming that the latter relates to the same offense as the former, and prescribes a greater punishment for it, because one of the parties is a negro, or of negro descent, claims that a discrimination is made against the colored person in the punishment designated, which conflicts with the clause of the fourteenth amendment prohibiting a state from denying to any person within its...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Zelaya v. Hammer
... ... Thurman , 484 F.3d at 859. This factual matter must "state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 570, ... ––––, 138 S. Ct. 2392, 2423, 201 L.Ed.2d 775 (2018) 26 ; Pace v. Alabama , 106 U.S. 583, 1 S.Ct. 637, 27 L.Ed. 207 (1883) (upholding anti-miscegenation ... ...
-
Laughlin v. State of Florida
... ... Solely on the authority of Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583, 1 S.Ct. 637, 27 L.Ed. 207, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed and sustained the validity of § 798.05 as against ... ...
-
In re Marriage Cases
...of our own legislation, and there is none to the contrary" (id. at p. 752, 198 P.2d 17), and emphasized that in Pace v. Alabama (1882) 106 U.S. 583, 1 S.Ct. 637, 27 L.Ed. 207, rejected by McLaughlin v. Florida (1964) 379 U.S. 184, 188, 85 S.Ct. 283, 13 L.Ed.2d 222, the United States Supreme......
-
Compassion in Dying v. State of Wash.
... ... It could have done so previously but chose to sidestep the issue. See Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583, 585, 1 S.Ct. 637, 638, 27 L.Ed. 207 (1883). At the time of the Loving decision, sixteen states still prohibited and ... ...
-
Are You My Mother? – The Federal Courts and the American Family
...in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), decided in Oregon, not a territory. And then there are the state cases. Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583 (1883). Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967). Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978). The DRE was in full force in 1967 and 1978. It......
-
Interstate recognition of same-sex marriages and civil unions: a handbook for judges.
...the prevention of which is dictated by a sound public policy affecting the highest interests of society and government."), aff'd, 106 U.S. 583 (1883); Green v. State, 58 Ala. 190, 195 (1877) ("And surely there can not be any tyranny or injustice in requiring both [races] alike[] to form thi......
-
REPUGNANT PRECEDENTS AND THE COURT OF HISTORY.
...on the Insular Cases."). (425.) 335 U.S. 464, 467 (1948). (426.) Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 210 n.23 (1976). (427.) Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583, 585 (1883). (428.) McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184, 188 (1964) (confirming that Pace could no longer be cited "as controlling authority")......
-
The Supreme Court and the Memory of Evil.
...Question of Justice: African-American Legal Perspectives on the 1883 Civil Rights Cases, 70 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1123 (1995). (88.) See 106 U.S. 583, 585 (1883), overruled by McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184 (1964). (89.) See id. (90.) 163 U.S. 537 (1896), overruled by Brown v. Bd. of Educ.......
-
Textualism and the Fourteenth Amendment.
...(251.) See Strauss, supra note 157, at 85-92. (252.) See Plessy, 163 U.S. at 544-46 (collecting authorities); see also Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583, 584-85 (1883) (unanimously upholding a state law prohibition on interracial marriage). A few pre-Plessy cases had disapproved racial segregat......