Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., s. 82-3152
| Decision Date | 20 October 1983 |
| Docket Number | 82-3182,Nos. 82-3152,s. 82-3152 |
| Citation | 718 F.2d 971 |
| Parties | PACEMAKER DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC OF AMERICA, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. INSTROMEDIX, INC., an Oregon Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
J. Pierre Kolisch, Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson & Stuart, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee, cross-appellant.
Sherman O. Parrett, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983) is withdrawn.
Oral argument in the above case will be held in San Francisco, on Tuesday, November 15, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc.
...Inc., 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983), and the court has convened en banc to reconsider the case. Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic v. Instromedix, Inc., 718 F.2d 971 (9th Cir.1983) (order granting rehearing en banc). We hold that, in light of the statutory precondition of voluntary litigant consent......
-
In re LT Ruth Coal Co., Inc., Bankruptcy No. 84-00197
...Diagnostic Clinic, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983), reh'g en banc granted Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic v. Instromedix, Inc., 718 F.2d 971 (9th Cir.1983). 7 Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic v. Instromedix, Inc., 725 F.2d 537 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824, 105 S......
-
U.S. v. Woodley
...See also Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983), reh'g en banc granted, 718 F.2d 971 (9th Cir.1983). In sum, the plain language of the Constitution, the history of the adoption of article II and article III, and decisions of the Supre......
-
Swallow Turn Music v. Tidal Basin, Inc.
...set forth in the case of Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic v. Instromedix, Inc., 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983), reh'g en banc granted 718 F.2d 971 (9th Cir.1983), in which the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found § 636(c) to be violative of Article III of the United States Constitution.4 Defendant......