Pacific Indem. Co. v. Thompson

Citation56 Wn.2d 715,355 P.2d 12
Decision Date08 September 1960
Docket NumberNo. 35337,35337
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Washington
PartiesPACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, Respondent, v. William THOMPSON and Jane Doe Thompson, his wife, and Wesley Thompson, Defendants, Martha Margaret Harris, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Nicholas Harris, Deceased, Appellant.

Edwin R. Johnson, Tacoma, for appellant.

Guttormsen, Scholfield, Willits & Ager, by Jack P. Scholfield, Seattle, for respondent.

FOSTER, Judge.

Respondent insurance company, by declaratory judgment procedure, sought adjudication of the extent of its liability under a family automobile liability policy in which defendant William Thompson is the named insured. The judgment declares that the insurance is limited to ten thousand dollars for injury or death of one person. Martha Harris, both in her own right and as administratrix of her husband's estate, appeals. Her husband was killed in a collision with a car driven by the son of the insured William Thompson, which car was one of three covered by respondent's insurance policy.

Because the policy limits on each of the three cars owned by the Thompsons is ten thousand dollars, appellant contends that the maximum coverage is, therefore, three times that sum. The argument, based on condition No. 4 of the policy (which provides that all of the policy's terms shall apply separately to each described automobile), is that contributing coverage is thereby afforded. However, that provision merely assures the applicability of the policy to whichever car is involved in an accident, or to all the cars, and does no more.

The contract limits the company's liability for bodily injury or death of one person arising out of one occurrence to a maximum of ten thousand dollars, with no contribution from one coverage to another. The language is:

'The limit of bodily injury liability stated in the declarations as applicable to 'each person' is the limit of the company's liability for all damages, including damages for care and loss of services, arising out of bodily injury sustained by one person as the result of any one occurrence; the limit of such liability stated in the declarations as applicable to 'each occurrence' is, subject to the above provision respecting each person, the total limit of the company's liability for all such damages arising out of bodily injury sustained by two or more persons as the result of any one occurrence.'

The quoted provision is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
40 cases
  • Slack v. Robinson
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • May 1, 2003
    ...Houser v. Gilbert, 389 N.W.2d 626 (N.D. 1986); Thompson v. Cont'l Ins. Cos., 291 S.C. 47, 351 S.E.2d 904 (1986); Pac. Indem. Co. v. Thompson, 56 Wash.2d 715, 355 P.2d 12 (1960); Payne v. Weston, 195 W.Va. 502, 466 S.E.2d 161 (1995); Shamblin v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 175 W.Va. 337, 332 S......
  • Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. Grimstad-Hardy
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1993
    ...ambiguity when read together with the policy's limit of liability section, thus stacking was not permitted. Pacific Indem. Co. v. Thompson, 56 Wash.2d 715, 716, 355 P.2d 12 (1960). The court noted the purpose of a separability clause is to render the policy applicable to whichever insured c......
  • Emick v. Dairyland Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • August 6, 1975
    ...listed under the policy, and one of the listed automobiles is involved in an accident. As the court stated in Pacific Indem. Co. v. Thompson, 56 Wash.2d 715, 355 P.2d 12 (1960), referring to a typical separability clause: "that provision merely assures the applicability of the policy to whi......
  • Employers Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd. v. Jackson
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 29, 1972
    ...Mutual Ins. Co., 255 Or. 425, 467 P.2d 963; Castle v. United Pacific Insurance Group, 252 Or. 44, 448 P.2d 357; Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson, 56 Wash.2d 715, 355 P.2d 12; Polland v. Allstate Insurance Company, 25 A.D.2d 16, 266 N.Y.S.2d 286 (New York); Hilton v. Citizens Insurance Comp......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT