Pacific Nat Bank of Boston v. Eaton
Decision Date | 25 May 1891 |
Citation | 141 U.S. 227,11 S.Ct. 984,35 L.Ed. 702 |
Parties | PACIFIC NAT. BANK OF BOSTON v. EATON |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
A. A. Ranney, for plaintiff in error.
J. H. Benton, Jr., for defendant in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 228-230 intentionally omitted]
This case belongs to the same group as Delano v. Butler, 118 U. S. 634, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 39, and Aspinwall v. Butler, 133 U. S. 597, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 417. It relates to certain shares of the increased stock of the Pacific National Bank of Boston issued in September, 1881. The circumstances under which said stock was created and subcribed are detailed in the reports of the cases referred to, and need not be repeated here. It will suffice to state those which are peculiar to the present case, only adverting to such others as may be necessary to understnad it. On September 13, 1881, the capital stock of the bank was $500,000, and on that day the directors voted that the capital be increased to $1,000,000, and that the stockholders have the right to take the new stock at par. in equal amounts to that then held by them. Subscriptions to the new stock were payable October 1, 1881. Mary J. Eaton, the defendant in error, having 40 shares (equal to $4,000,) of the original stock, took her full share of the new stock, and paid for it September 28, 1881, and received the following receipt therefor:
'Boston, October 1st, 1881.
'Received of Mary J. Eaton four thousand dollars on account of subscription to new stock.
'J. M. PETENGILL, Cashier.'
The stockholders of the bank did not all avail themselves of the right to take new stock, but $461,300 of the $500,000 were taken and paid in. At the request of the directors, and the sanction of a large majority of the stockholders, the increase of stock was afterwards limited to the said sum paid in, and approved by the comptroller of the currency, who made and executed his certificate to that effect. Certificates for the new stock were made out in a book, with stubs to indicate their contents, and were delivered to the stockholders as they called for them. Such a certificate was made out for Miss Eaton, but she never called for it, though she was registered in the stock register of the bank as owner thereof without her knowledge. The statement of facts, among other things, has the following: On the 10th of January, 1882, there was held an annual meeting of the stockholders of the bank for the election of directors and other business, at which it was voted, in accordance with an order from the comptroller of the currency, made under section 5205 of the Revised Statutes, to make an assessment of 100 per cent. upon the shareholders of the bank, pro rata for the amount of capital stock held by each; the vote being 5,494 shares for the assessment, and 55 shares against it. The defendant in error on the day of the annual meeting, and before its opening, made the following demand upon the bank in writing, delivered to the directors: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wright v. Hix
... ... Gettysburg Nat. Bank v. Brown, 95 Md. 367, 52 A ... 975, 93 Am.St.Rep. 339. So, also, such ... Paul, etc., Co. v. Robbins, ... 23 Minn. 439; Pac. Nat. Bank v. Eaton, 141 U.S. 234, ... 11 Sup.Ct. 984, 35 L.Ed. 702; Jay Gould v. Town of ... ...
-
Scott v. Latimer
...court has modified or departed from this holding in the later cases of Aspinwall v. Butler, 133 U.S. 595, 10 Sup.Ct. 417; Bank v. Easton, 141 U.S. 227, 11 Sup.Ct. 984; Thayer v. Butler, 141 U.S. 234, 11 Sup.Ct. 987. In each of those cases the amount of increase originally proposed was $500,......
-
Palmer v. Bank of Zumbrota
...not available as a defense against creditors. Delano v. Butler, 118 U.S. 634; Aspinwall v. Butler, 133 U.S. 595; Pacific Nat. Bank v. Eaton, 141 U.S. 227; Thayer v. Butler, 141 U.S. 234; Butler Eaton, 141 U.S. 240. Where the abstract power to increase the capital stock of a corporation is g......
-
Rogers v. Gross
... ... Biss. 246, Fed. Cas. No. 13,568; Thompson v. Reno Savings ... Bank, 19 Nev. 103, 7 P. 68; Lee v. Imbrie, 13 ... Ore. 510, 11 P. 270; Great ... stock is not necessary to constitute one a stockholder ... Pacific Nat. Bank v. Eaton, 141 U.S. 227, 11 S.Ct ... 984; American P. I. S. Co ... ...