Padgett v. International Paper Co.
| Decision Date | 01 May 1985 |
| Citation | 470 So.2d 1287 |
| Parties | Dwight PADGETT v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY. Civ. 4430. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Francis E. Leon, Jr. of Diamond, Leon & Barter, Mobile, for appellant.
Carroll H. Sullivan of Gaillard, Little, Hume & Sullivan, Mobile, for appellee.
This is a workmen's compensation case.
The employee sustained an injury to his lower back during the course of his employment. The trial court found that the employee was entitled to workmen's compensation benefits for twelve weeks of temporary total disability. Additionally, the trial court determined the employee suffered a ten percent permanent partial disability.
The employee appeals both of these determinations, and we affirm.
At the outset we note that workmen's compensation cases are before this court by writ of certiorari. Ala.Code (1975), § 25-5-81(d). On certiorari our review "is limited to questions of law and to an examination of the evidence to determine if there is any legal evidence to support the findings of the trial court." Armstrong v. Lewis & Associates Construction Co., 451 So.2d 332, 334 (Ala.Civ.App.1984). Under this narrow standard of review, if there is any legal evidence that supports the findings of the trial court, this court will affirm those findings. Benefield v. Goodwill Industries of Mobile, [Ms. February 27, 1985] --- So.2d ---- (Ala.Civ.App.1985); Wilson v. Berry Industries Company, 451 So.2d 339 (Ala.Civ.App.1984); Alatex, Inc. v. Couch, 449 So.2d 1254 (Ala.Civ.App.1984).
The employee asserts that there is no evidence which supports the trial court's finding that the employee was only entitled to twelve weeks of temporary total disability. We disagree.
The trial court notes in its final order the evidence upon which it relied in making the determination that the employee's period of total disability was twelve weeks. There was medical evidence that the employee's back injury, which had been diagnosed as chronic lumbar strain, did not involve a herniated disc or neurological damage. The testimony of the employee's treating physicians was that his back injury had not required surgery and that they did not anticipate that surgery would be necessary in the future.
We note the difficult task with which a trial court is faced in a workmen's compensation case when it must specify the date to which an employee's total disability extends and his permanent partial disability begins. The period of temporary total disability may be determined in the trial court's "best judgment" from all the testimony, taking into consideration the nature of the injury. Malbis Bakery Co. v. Collins, 245 Ala. 84, 15 So.2d 705 (1943).
In this case the trial court was clearly warranted in finding, based upon the evidence before it, including that of the employee himself, that the employee's temporary total disability was for a period of twelve weeks.
The employee also asserts on appeal that there is no evidence in the record which supports the trial court's finding that the employee's permanent partial disability is ten percent, i.e., that he is now able to earn ten percent less than his average weekly earnings at the time of his injury. We again disagree.
The employee himself entered into written joint stipulations with the employer in which it was specified "[t]hat ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Patterson v. Clarke County Motors, Inc.
...education, experience, and other such factors which affect his employability and thus his earning capacity. Padgett v. International Paper Co., 470 So.2d 1287 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). This case is due to be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this AFFIRMED IN PART......
-
Co-op Pulpwood Co., Inc. v. Partridge, CO-OP
...of the weight of the evidence or of the trial court's findings of fact is not properly before this court. Padgett v. International Paper Co., 470 So.2d 1287 (Ala.Civ.App.1985); Davis v. Fabarc Steel Supply, Inc., 469 So.2d 114 (Ala.Civ.App.1985); Rice v. Wellborn Forest Products, Inc., 465 ......
-
Wiley Sanders Truck Lines, Inc. v. McLain
...528 So.2d 881 (Ala.Civ.App.1988). If any legal evidence supports the trial court's findings, we must affirm. Padgett v. International Paper Co., 470 So.2d 1287 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). Our review of the record reveals ample legal evidence supporting the trial court's finding that the employee's ......
-
Arrow Trucking Lines v. Robinson
...Insurance Co. v. Hinote, 498 So.2d 848 (Ala.Civ.App.1986); Lowe v. Walters, 491 So.2d 962 (Ala.Civ.App.1986); Padgett v. International Paper Co., 470 So.2d 1287 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). Our review of the record indicates that there is clearly evidence which supports the trial court's conclusion ......