Padilla, et al. v. Yoo

Docket Number09-16478
Decision Date02 May 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
101 cases
  • Koch v. King
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • January 11, 2017
    ...of prisoners, to establish a floor for the constitutional rights of persons detained under a civil commitment scheme. Padilla v. Yoo, 678 F.3d 748, 759 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Hydrick v. Hunter, 500 F.3d 978, 989 (9th Cir. 2007), vacated and remanded on other grounds by 556 U.S. 1256 (2009)......
  • McGreal v. AT & T Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • September 24, 2012
    ...that requesting a subpoena of an individual's cell phone records may constitute a constitutional violation. See, e.g., Padilla v. Yoo, 678 F.3d 748, 766–68 (9th Cir.2012) (reversing the denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss on grounds of qualified immunity because at the time the defe......
  • Walker v. Wechsler
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • October 11, 2016
    ...of prisoners, to establish a floor for the constitutional rights of persons detained under a civil commitment scheme. Padilla v. Yoo, 678 F.3d 748, 759 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Hydrick v. Hunter, 500 F.3d 978, 989 (9th Cir. 2007), vacated and remanded on other grounds by 556 U.S. 1256 (2009)......
  • Frary v. Cnty. of Marin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • February 25, 2015
    ...gives government officials breathing room to make reasonable but mistaken judgments about open legal questions[.]” Padilla v. Yoo, 678 F.3d 748, 758 (9th Cir.2012).But this is not the end of the inquiry. First, section 1027 does not describe how often an inmate should be monitored in light ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Unconstitutional Torture of an American by the U.s. Military: Is There a Remedy Under Bivens?
    • United States
    • Georgia State University College of Law Georgia State Law Reviews No. 29-4, June 2013
    • Invalid date
    ...2011); Arar v. Ashcroft, 585 F.3d 559, 563 (2d Cir. 2009). But see Padilla v. Yoo, 633 F. Supp. 2d 1005, 1025 (N.D. Cal. 2009), rev'd, 678 F.3d 748 (9th Cir. 2012) (holding that Bivens did not preclude a remedy for an American citizen detained in the United States because "special factors [......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT