Paige v. Com. of Va., 95-6821

Decision Date04 October 1995
Docket NumberNo. 95-6821,95-6821
Citation67 F.3d 296
PartiesNOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter Ellis PAIGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia; Supreme Court of Virginia; the General Assembly; Governor of Virginia; Attorney General of Virginia; the Council on Human Rights; Board of Education, Director; Department of Corrections, Director; Augusta Correctional Center; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Walter Ellis Paige, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) action that alleged civil rights violations for Virginia's failure to enact the United Nations' "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" into law through legislation or judicial fiat. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Paige v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-95-428 (E.D.Va. May 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Cook v. Unisys Fed. Gov't, Grp., Div. of Unisys Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • September 3, 2015
    ...Universal Declaration of Human Rights ("UDHR"). No private right of action exists under the UDHR. See Paige v. Virginia, 67 F.3d 296, at *1 (4th Cir. 1995) (unpublished table opinion); Abebe v. Sutton, No. 5:12-202, 2012 WL 1096153, at *1 (D.S.C. April 2, 2012) ("The UDHR does not of its ow......
  • James-Bey v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. Safety
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of North Carolina
    • October 14, 2019
    ...on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. There is no private right of action under this Declaration. See Paige v. Virginia, 67 F.3d 296 (4th Cir. 1995) (unpublished table opinion); Bey v. North Carolina, No. 3:12-cv-454, 2012 WL 3528005, *1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2012). As such, the Court will not ......
  • Yu' Sunrus Bey v. North Carolina
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of North Carolina
    • August 13, 2012
    ...has no private right of action under the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). See Paige v. Virginia, 67 F.3d 296 (4th Cir. 1995) (unpublished table opinion); Abebe v. Sutton, No. 5:12-202, 2012 WL 1096153 (D.S.C. April 2, 2012) ("The UDHR 'does not of its own force ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT