Paige v. United States, 71-2255.
| Decision Date | 07 February 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 71-2255.,71-2255. |
| Citation | 456 F.2d 1278 |
| Parties | Gary Julius PAIGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Gary Julius Paige, in pro. per.
Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nokles, Chief, Crim. Div., Brian J. O'Neill, Ass't Chief, Crim. Div., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
Appealing from denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, appellant assigns as error failure of the District Court to give consideration to various errors he asserts were committed in the course of his trial for bank robbery. One of these alleged errors was raised by appellant on direct appeal from judgment of conviction and was rejected by this court. United States v. Paige (9th Cir. 1971). The others relate to matters of evidence, the use of memoranda by a witness and remarks made by the government attorney. All could have been asserted on direct appeal but were not. None is of such dimensions as to present a question of due process. A sentence is not subject to collateral attack on the basis of such alleged error. Dodd v. United States, 321 F.2d 240 (9th Cir. 1963).
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Grasso
...2255 motion. Porth v. Templar, 453 F.2d 330 (10th Cir. 1971); Overton v. United States, 450 F.2d 919 (5th Cir. 1971); Paige v. United States, 456 F.2d 1278 (9th Cir. 1972); and (3) issues apparent on the record on direct appeal are considered to have been waived for purposes of a § 2255 mot......
-
Beamon v. State
...States, 545 F.2d 1116, 1117 (8th Cir. 1976) Cert. denied 429 U.S. 1111, 97 S.Ct. 1148, 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977); Paige v. United States, 456 F.2d 1278, 1279 (9th Cir. 1972); Eagleston v. United States, 448 F.2d 1389, 1389-90 (10th Cir. Because sec. 974.06, Stats., 1975, was taken directly from......
-
Carlucci v. United States
...§ 2255 to relitigate a claim that was previously rejected on direct appeal." Foster, 136 S. Ct. at 1758; Paige v. United States, 456 F.2d 1278, 1279 (9th Cir. 1972) (per curiam); United States v. Castellano, 75 F. App'x 629, 630 (9th Cir. 2003). If petitioner demonstrates an intervening cha......
-
Paige v. United States
...29 L.Ed.2d 142). On June 16, 1971, Paige filed his first § 2255 motion, which was denied. On appeal, we affirmed. Paige v. United States, 9 Cir., 1972, 456 F.2d 1278. He filed a second § 2255 motion on March 9, 1972. This, too, was denied, and we again affirmed, in an unreported decision, o......