Paiya v. Durham Const. Co., Inc.

CourtWashington Supreme Court
CitationPaiya v. Durham Const. Co., Inc., 863 P.2d 73, 122 Wn.2d 1014 (Wash. 1993)
Decision Date06 October 1993
PartiesPaiya (Peter) v. Durham Construction Company, Inc., Wall Finishes, Inc., Lorge (Dr. John P., III) NO. 60589-1

Petition For Review: Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...Sch. Dist., 96 Wn.2d 806, 638 P.2d 1220 (1982): 54.6(5) Paiya v. Durham Constr. Co., 69 Wn.App. 578, 849 P.2d 660, review denied, 122 Wn.2d 1014 (1993): 26.6(2)(e) Palidor v. Hovde, 164 Wn.App. 1016, No. 68112-5-I, 2013 WL 1164423 (Mar. 18, 2013): 17.4 Palmer v. Jensen, 132 Wn.2d 193, 937 P......
  • §26.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 26 Rule 26.General Provisions Governing Discovery
    • Invalid date
    ...Id. (citing, inter alia, Peters, 58 Wn.App. 921). In Paiya v. Durham Construction Co., 69 Wn.App. 578, 579, 849P.2d660, review denied, 122 Wn.2d 1014 (1993), the appellate court held that a treating chiropractor was not entitled to his normal fees for deposition attendance. Relying on Baird......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Family Law Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...(1984) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.04[2][b] Paiya v. Durham Constr. Co., 69 Wn. App. 578, 849 P.2d 660, review denied, 122 Wn.2d 1014 (1993) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.03[3], [5] Palmer v. Laberee, 23 Wash. 409, 63 P. 216 (1900) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
  • §22.03 General Principles
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Family Law Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 22 Discovery In Family Law Litigation
    • Invalid date
    ...who are retained to develop facts and opinions for trial. Paiya v. Durham Constr. Co., 69 Wn. App. 578, 580, 849 P.2d 660, review denied, 122 Wn.2d 1014 (1993). Notes from fact witnesses are properly discoverable. In re Acqui, 84 Wn. App. 88, 929 P.2d 436 (1996). Documents prepared for an i......