Palermo v. Luckenbach Steamship Company
| Decision Date | 21 October 1957 |
| Docket Number | No. 350,350 |
| Citation | 78 S.Ct. 1,2 L.Ed.2d 3,355 U.S. 20 |
| Parties | Pasquale PALERMO, Petitioner, v. LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
See 355 U.S. 910, 78 S.Ct. 337.
Mr. Philip F. Di Costanzo, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Mr. Robert Klonsky on the brief), for petitioner.
Messrs. Eugene Underwood, William M. Kimball, New York City, for respondent.
The petition for certiorari is granted, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded.* We hold that the trial court did not commit reversible error in refusing to charge respondent's request No. 12. The petitioner's alleged choice of a more dangerous route did not, under the proofs, operate to bar recovery as a matter of law. The jury was properly instructed that the petitioner's negligence, if any, was to be considered in mitigation of damages under the rule applicable in actions for personal injuries arising from maritime torts. Pope & Talbot, Inc., v. Hawn, 346 U.S. 406, 408—409, 74 S.Ct. 202, 204—205, 98 L.Ed. 143; cf. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v Smith, 305 U.S. 424, 59 S.Ct. 262, 83 L.Ed. 265. For reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 524, 77 S.Ct. 443, 459, 1 L.Ed.2d 493, Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.
Memorandum of Mr. Justice HARLAN, with whom Mr. Justice BURTON and Mr. Justice WHITTAKER join. For reasons elaborated by Mr. Justice Frankfurter at the last Term, 352 U.S. 521, 524, 77 S.Ct. 457, I think that certiorari should have been denied. However, I continue in the view, expressed at the last Term, 35 U.S. 559, 77 S.Ct. 478, that once certiorari has been granted in such cases, we disbelievers, consistent with the Court's certiorari procedure, should consider them on the merits. Further, much as I disagree, 352 U.S. 559, 562—564, 77 S.Ct. 478—481, with the reasoning and philosophy of the Rogers case, which strips the historic role of the judge in a jury trial of all meaningful significance, I feel presently bound to bow to it. Applying Rogers to the present cases, I am forced to concur in judgments of reversal in Nos. 142 and 350.
* Order amended Jan. 6, 1958, 78 S.Ct. 337, case remanded to Court of Appeals.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Solet v. M/V CAPT. HV DUFRENE, Civ. A. No. 67-1713.
...contributed to them in the amount of 30%. Solet's award for personal injury will be reduced accordingly. Palermo v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 20, 78 S.Ct. 1, 2 L.Ed. 2d 3. The defendant urges that the weld failed only because of the strain put on it by Solet. It seeks to demonstr......
-
Walters v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
...the expense of litigation may be a bar to further action by needy litigants. 7 Other reversals might include Palermo v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., 355 U.S. 20, 78 S.Ct. 1, 2 L.Ed.2d 3, reversing 2 Cir., 246 F.2d 557; Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 352 U.S. 521, 77 S.Ct. 459, 1 L.Ed.2d 515, r......
-
Edynak v. Atlantic Shipping Inc. Cie. Chambon Maclovia S. A.
...Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn, 346 U.S. 406, 409-10, 74 S.Ct. 202, 204, 98 L.Ed. 143 (1953). Accord, Palermo v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., 355 U.S. 20, 21, 78 S.Ct. 1, 2 L.Ed.2d 3 (1958); Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki, 328 U.S. 85, 94 n. 11, 66 S.Ct. 872, 90 L.Ed. 1099 (1946); The Max Morris, 137 U......
-
Thompson v. Erie R. Co.
...case the seaman, in the performance of his duties, is not deemed to assume the risk of unseaworthy appliances.' 'And in Palermo v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., 78 S.Ct. 1, the Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the Second Circuit, 246 F.2d 557, which denied recovery to a longshoreman who was......
-
Federal employer negligence statutes
...be contributorily negligent. Savoie v. Otto Candies, Inc., 692 F.2d 363, 372 (5th Cir. 1982); Palermo v. Luckenbach Steamship Co., Inc. , 355 U.S. 20, 21 (1957). It is well settled in admiralty law that such negligence is not a complete bar to plaintiff’s recovery, but results only in mitig......