Paliani v. Selapack

Citation112 N.Y.S.3d 670 (Mem),178 A.D.3d 1425
Decision Date20 December 2019
Docket NumberCAF 18–01010,1156
Parties In the Matter of Nicholas PALIANI, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Stephanie SELAPACK, Respondent–Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

178 A.D.3d 1425
112 N.Y.S.3d 670 (Mem)

In the Matter of Nicholas PALIANI, Petitioner–Respondent,
v.
Stephanie SELAPACK, Respondent–Appellant.
(Appeal No. 1.)

1156
CAF 18–01010

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Entered: December 20, 2019


CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.

BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT.

AUDREY ROSE HERMAN, BUFFALO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

112 N.Y.S.3d 671

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, respondent mother appeals from an order of protection issued in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8 upon a finding that she committed a family offense. In appeal No. 2, the mother appeals from an order entered in a custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 determining that she willfully violated an order of custody. Both orders provided that the mother would have only supervised visitation with the subject child.

With respect to appeal No. 1, we reject the mother's contention that petitioner father failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the mother committed the family offense of aggravated harassment in the second degree (see Matter of Clausell v. Salame, 156 A.D.3d 1401, 1402, 65 N.Y.S.3d 873 [4th Dept. 2017] ; Matter of Parameswar v. Parameswar, 109 A.D.3d 473, 474, 970 N.Y.S.2d 793 [2d Dept. 2013] ; see also Family Ct Act § 832 ; Penal Law § 240.30[1][a] ). The father testified that, after Family Court

178 A.D.3d 1426

issued a decision granting him sole custody of the child, the mother called him and told him that if he took the child away from her, she would kill herself and the child. While the mother denied the allegation, the court...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Grabowski v. Smith
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 24, 2020
    ... ... Specifically, affording great weight to the court's assessment of the credibility of the witnesses (see Matter of Paliani v. Selapack, 178 A.D.3d 1425, 1426, 112 N.Y.S.3d 670 [4th Dept. 2019] ), we conclude that the mother established that her relationship with the ... ...
  • Joseph S. v. Tina W.
    • United States
    • New York Family Court
    • September 20, 2022
    ... ... advantage ... in observ[ing] the demeanor of the ... witnesses"]; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167 ... [1982]; Matter of Paliani v Selapack , 178 A.D.3d ... 1425, 1426 [4th Dept 2017]); see also Matter of Cross v ... Casewell , 113 AD30 (1107 [4th Dept 2014]). For example, ... ...
  • In re Brady S v. Darla B.
    • United States
    • New York Family Court
    • December 14, 2020
    ... ... in observ[ing] the demeanor of ... the witnesses"]; Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d ... 167 [1982]; Matter of Paliani v Selapack , 178 A.D.3d ... 1425, 1426 [4th Dept 2017]); see also Matter of Cross v ... Casewell , 113 AD30 (1107 [4th Dept 2014]) ... ...
  • Dickes v. Johnston
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 3, 2023
    ... ... omitted]). Specifically, affording great weight to the ... court's assessment of the credibility of the witnesses ... (see Matter of Paliani v Selapack, 178 A.D.3d 1425, ... 1426 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 905 ... [2020]), we conclude that the father established that the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT