Palicio y Compania v. Brush, No. 415

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation375 F.2d 1011
Docket NumberDocket 30984.,No. 415
Decision Date26 April 1967
PartiesF. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, S. A., Cifuentes Y Compania, Por Larranaga, S. A., Menendez, Garcia Y Compania, Limitada, and Tabacalera Jose L. Piedra, S. A., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees, v. Gilbert P. BRUSH and Monroe Percy Bloch, co-partners, doing business under the firm name and style of Brush & Bloch, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.

375 F.2d 1011 (1967)

F. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, S. A., Cifuentes Y Compania, Por Larranaga, S. A., Menendez, Garcia Y Compania, Limitada, and Tabacalera Jose L. Piedra, S. A., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees,
v.
Gilbert P. BRUSH and Monroe Percy Bloch, co-partners, doing business under the firm name and style of Brush & Bloch, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees.

No. 415, Docket 30984.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 17, 1967.

Decided April 26, 1967.


Leonard B. Boudin, New York City (Rabinowitz & Boudin, New York City, Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants-appellees.

Jac M. Wolff, New York City (Brush & Bloch, New York City, Monroe Percy Bloch, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants-appellees.

Before MOORE, KAUFMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Having considered the various points raised by plaintiffs-appellants-appellees and defendants-appellants-appellees, we are of the opinion that Judge Bryan's discussion of the facts and his analysis and application of the law are correct; we therefore affirm on the basis of his well reasoned opinion reported at 256 F.Supp. 481 (S.D.N.Y.1966).

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 practice notes
  • Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc v. Republic of Cuba, No. 73-1288
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1974
    ...345 F.Supp. 527 (SDNY 1972), and in closely related litigatn, F. Palicio y Compania, S.A. v. Brush, 256 F.Supp. 481 (SDNY 1966), aff'd, 375 F.2d 1011 (CA2), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 830, 88 S.Ct. 95, 19 L.Ed.2d 88 (1967). For present purposes, the following recitation will suffice. In 1960, t......
  • Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, No. 59
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • July 31, 1967
    ...the corporation were owned by resident Cuban citizens, see F. Palico y Compania v. Brush, 256 F.Supp. 481 (SDNY 1966), aff'd per curiam, 375 F.2d 1011 (2 Cir. 1967), but such is not the case here. We repeat with emphasis our earlier When a foreign state treats a corporation in a particular ......
  • Menendez v. Saks and Company, No. 872
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • September 24, 1973
    ...pending a determination of these rights and then were adjusted to conform to the Palicio decision, which was affirmed by this court. 375 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Brush v. Republic of Cuba, 389 U.S. 830, 88 S.Ct. 95, 19 L.Ed.2d 88 After Palicio was decided, the interventors (includ......
  • Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena, No. 62 Civ. 850.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • November 7, 1968
    ...First National City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1965); F. Palicio y Compania, S. A. v. Brush, 256 F.Supp. 481, 486 (S.D. N.Y.1966), affd., 375 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir. 293 F. Supp. 911 1967). The "act of state" doctrine may therefore be invoked here as an independent basis for recognition of the W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
31 cases
  • Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc v. Republic of Cuba, No. 73-1288
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • December 10, 1974
    ...345 F.Supp. 527 (SDNY 1972), and in closely related litigatn, F. Palicio y Compania, S.A. v. Brush, 256 F.Supp. 481 (SDNY 1966), aff'd, 375 F.2d 1011 (CA2), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 830, 88 S.Ct. 95, 19 L.Ed.2d 88 (1967). For present purposes, the following recitation will suffice. In 1960, t......
  • Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, No. 59
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • July 31, 1967
    ...the corporation were owned by resident Cuban citizens, see F. Palico y Compania v. Brush, 256 F.Supp. 481 (SDNY 1966), aff'd per curiam, 375 F.2d 1011 (2 Cir. 1967), but such is not the case here. We repeat with emphasis our earlier When a foreign state treats a corporation in a particular ......
  • Menendez v. Saks and Company, No. 872
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • September 24, 1973
    ...pending a determination of these rights and then were adjusted to conform to the Palicio decision, which was affirmed by this court. 375 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Brush v. Republic of Cuba, 389 U.S. 830, 88 S.Ct. 95, 19 L.Ed.2d 88 After Palicio was decided, the interventors (includ......
  • Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss, Jena, No. 62 Civ. 850.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • November 7, 1968
    ...First National City Bank, 353 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1965); F. Palicio y Compania, S. A. v. Brush, 256 F.Supp. 481, 486 (S.D. N.Y.1966), affd., 375 F.2d 1011 (2d Cir. 293 F. Supp. 911 1967). The "act of state" doctrine may therefore be invoked here as an independent basis for recognition of the W......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT