Palmer v. Helmer, 36283.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Kansas
Writing for the CourtBURCH, Justice.
Citation157 P.2d 531,159 Kan. 647
PartiesPALMER et al. v. HELMER et al.
Decision Date07 April 1945
Docket Number36283.

157 P.2d 531

159 Kan. 647

PALMER et al.
v.
HELMER et al.

No. 36283.

Supreme Court of Kansas

April 7, 1945


Appeal from District Court, Bourbon County; Harry W. Fisher, Judge.

Appeal from District Court, Bourbon County; Harry W. Fisher, Judge.

Quiet title action by Ralph Ralmer and others against Frank Helmer and others, and the Board of County Commissioners of the county of Bourbon. From a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendant Board of County Commissioners appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Syllabus by the Court.

1. When the overruling of a motion for new trial is not assigned as error, any possible error committed thereby cannot be reviewed.

2. The mere fact that a motion for new trial is pending does not extend the time within which an appeal can be taken from a final judgment when such a motion is not necessary or proper and only requests a second ruling on the same question of law previously passed upon by the trial court.

3. The question of whether personal property tax liens upon real estate, entered in the same manner as a judgment, are such judgments as become dormant, cannot be passed upon as this court is without jurisdiction because the appeal was not perfected in time.

Frank O'Brien, Co. Atty., of Fort Scott, for appellant.

No appearance was made for appellees.

Douglas Hudson and Walter B. Patterson, both of Fort Scott (T. M. Lillard, Robert L. Webb, Ralph F. Glenn, and Margaret McGurnaghan, all of Topeka, on the brief), amici curiae.

BURCH, Justice.

The appeal in this case raises the question whether personal property tax liens on real estate become dormant. To be more specific, the question is whether the abstract of the amount of delinquent personal property taxes, penalty and costs, accompanied by the last tax warrant, when filed with the clerk of the district court and entered by him in his judgment docket as provided by G.S.1935, 79-2105, are judgments, and if so, are the liens upon real estate created thereby such judgments as become dormant under the provisions of G.S.1935, 60-3405, unless revived under G.S.1935, 60-3221.

The appeal arises out of a quiet-title action in which the board [159 Kan. 648] of county commissioners of Bourbon County, Kansas, was named as a defendant along with others, [157 P.2d 532] which others have not appealed. The question raises cannot be passed on in this appeal because this court does not have jurisdiction.

In the petition it was alleged that personal property tax judgments were of record against the land involved, which judgments had been filed in the years 1914, 1915 and 1916, and the petition further alleged that such tax judgments were dormant and was not, therefore, valid liens upon the real estate. On April 19, 1944, the trial court filed findings of fact, conclusions of law, a memorandum in which it set forth the reasons justifying its conclusions of law, and on the same date the trial court signed and the clerk filed a journal entry designated as a 'Decree in Quiet Title.' The decree set forth that the personal tax judgments were dormant and no longer a lien on the real estate, and further specifically set forth that the defendants, including the board of county commissioners, were forever restrained and enjoined from ever making any claim to the land involved and that the personal tax judgments ' are now dormant and dead and no...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 practice notes
  • Polzin v. National Co-op. Refinery Ass'n, No. 39966
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • 9 Junio 1956
    ...99 P.2d 746; Wiseman Page 336 v. Richardson, 154 Kan. 245, 118 P.2d 605; Achenbach v. Baker, 157 Kan. 292, 139 P.2d 407; Palmer v. Helmer, 159 Kan. 647, 157 P.2d 531; Steinmeyer v. Barnett, 172 Kan. 215, 239 P.2d 827; Colyer v. Wood, 178 Kan. 5, 283 P.2d 398; that it is the duty of this cou......
  • Sherk's Estate, In re, No. 40488
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • 11 Mayo 1957
    ...161 Page 902 Kan. 4, 165 P.2d 760; Asendorf v. Asendorf, 162 Kan. 310, 176 P.2d 535; Pulliam v. Pulliam, supra; Palmer v. Helmer, 159 Kan. 647, 157 P.2d 531; West's Estate v. West, 167 Kan. 94, 204 P.2d 729; Kowing v. Douglas County Kaw Drainage Dist., 167 Kan. 387, 207 P.2d 457; In re Esta......
  • Toklan Royalty Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., No. 37691
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • 10 Diciembre 1949
    ...205, 206, 174 P.2d 1017, and we have no jurisdiction, Eikelberger v. Saline County Comm'rs, 151 Kan. 619, 100 P.2d 651; Palmer v. Helmer, 159 Kan. 647, 157 P.2d 531, to consider We can now turn to the real issue in this lawsuit. Panhandle contends it appears upon the face of the amended pet......
  • Ford v. Sewell, No. 42360
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • 10 Noviembre 1961
    ...Kan. 770] 758, 84 P. 719; Brewer v. Harris, 147 Kan. 197, 75 P.2d 287; Heniff v. Clausen, 154 Kan. 717, 121 P.2d 196; Palmer v. Helmer, 159 Kan. 647, 157 P.2d 531; Holmes v. Kalbach, 173 Kan. 736, 742, 252 P.2d 603; and numerous other decisions cited in Hatcher's Kansas Digest, Rev. Ed., Ap......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • Polzin v. National Co-op. Refinery Ass'n, No. 39966
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • 9 Junio 1956
    ...99 P.2d 746; Wiseman Page 336 v. Richardson, 154 Kan. 245, 118 P.2d 605; Achenbach v. Baker, 157 Kan. 292, 139 P.2d 407; Palmer v. Helmer, 159 Kan. 647, 157 P.2d 531; Steinmeyer v. Barnett, 172 Kan. 215, 239 P.2d 827; Colyer v. Wood, 178 Kan. 5, 283 P.2d 398; that it is the duty of this cou......
  • Sherk's Estate, In re, No. 40488
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • 11 Mayo 1957
    ...161 Page 902 Kan. 4, 165 P.2d 760; Asendorf v. Asendorf, 162 Kan. 310, 176 P.2d 535; Pulliam v. Pulliam, supra; Palmer v. Helmer, 159 Kan. 647, 157 P.2d 531; West's Estate v. West, 167 Kan. 94, 204 P.2d 729; Kowing v. Douglas County Kaw Drainage Dist., 167 Kan. 387, 207 P.2d 457; In re Esta......
  • Toklan Royalty Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., No. 37691
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • 10 Diciembre 1949
    ...205, 206, 174 P.2d 1017, and we have no jurisdiction, Eikelberger v. Saline County Comm'rs, 151 Kan. 619, 100 P.2d 651; Palmer v. Helmer, 159 Kan. 647, 157 P.2d 531, to consider We can now turn to the real issue in this lawsuit. Panhandle contends it appears upon the face of the amended pet......
  • Ford v. Sewell, No. 42360
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • 10 Noviembre 1961
    ...Kan. 770] 758, 84 P. 719; Brewer v. Harris, 147 Kan. 197, 75 P.2d 287; Heniff v. Clausen, 154 Kan. 717, 121 P.2d 196; Palmer v. Helmer, 159 Kan. 647, 157 P.2d 531; Holmes v. Kalbach, 173 Kan. 736, 742, 252 P.2d 603; and numerous other decisions cited in Hatcher's Kansas Digest, Rev. Ed., Ap......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT