Panera Bread v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office
| Decision Date | 13 July 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 05CA1465.,05CA1465. |
| Citation | 141 P.3d 970 |
| Parties | PANERA BREAD, LLC, and Sentry Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF the STATE OF COLORADO and Julio Medina, Respondents. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
City of Brighton & Cirsa v. Rodriguez
...findings must be upheld if they are supported by substantial evidence. § 8–43–301(8), C.R.S. (2013); see also Panera Bread, LLC v. ICAO, 141 P.3d 970, 972 (Colo.App.2006) (describing the substantial evidence standard). ¶ 12 Unlike factual findings, this Court reviews an administrative agenc......
-
Petrik v. JJ Concrete, Inc.
...such minor horseplay that it did not fall outside the scope of employment.”Panera Bread, LLC v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 141 P.3d 970, 973 (Colo.Ct.App.2006). The Court applied the factors and found that Phillips's deviation was not serious, because throwing the cords was not likely to ......
-
Loofbourrow v. Indus. Claims Appeals Office of State
...resolution of conflicts in the evidence, and plausible inferences drawn from the record. Panera Bread, LLC v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 141 P.3d 970, 972 (Colo.App.2006). The weight and credibility given expert witnesses' testimony is within the ALJ's discretion and may not be disturbed ......
-
Loofbourrow v. Indus. Claims Appeals Office of State
...resolution of conflicts in the evidence, and plausible inferences drawn from the record. Panera Bread, LLC v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 141 P.3d 970, 972 (Colo. App. 2006). The weight and credibility given expert witnesses' testimony is within the ALJ's discretion and may not be disturbe......