Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation, In re
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
| Writing for the Court | Before BECKER, MANSMANN and NYGAARD; BECKER |
| Citation | Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation, In re, 916 F.2d 829 (3rd Cir. 1990) |
| Decision Date | 23 November 1990 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 88-1973,s. 88-1973 |
| Parties | 21 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,184, 31 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 486 In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. BROWN, Christopher S. and Brown, Jacqueline Michell, h/w v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"), National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, United States of America, Christopher Brown, Appellant. In re PAOLI RAILROAD, YARD PCB LITIGATION. BROWN, Cathlene v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"), National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("CONRAIL") v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, United States of America, Cathlene Brown, Appellant. In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. BROWN, Craig A. and Brown, Catherine D. h/w v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"), National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("CONRAIL") v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, United States of America, Craig Brown, Appellant. In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. BARBETTA, Margherita v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"), National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("CONRAIL") v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, United States of America, Margherita Barbetta, Appellant. In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. JOHNSON, Mary Retta v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"), National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("CONRAIL") v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, United States of America, Mary Retta Johnson, Appellant. In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. BROWN, Celeste v. MONSANTO COMPANY, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority ("SEPTA"), National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), and Consolidated Rail Corporation ("CONRAIL") v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, United Stat |
D. Bruce Hanes, Friedman and Hanes, Philadelphia, Pa., for Christopher Brown, Cathlene Brown, Craig Brown, Margherita Barbetta, Mary Retta Johnson, Celeste Brown, Clemmon L. Brown, Cloyd Brown, Curtis Brown, appellants.
James C. Sargent, Jr., Lamb, Windle & McErlane, P.C., West Chester, Pa., for William Reid, Jr., appellant.
Geoffrey L. Beauchamp, Wisler, Pearlstine, Talone, Craig & Garrity, Norristown, Pa., Kenneth Roos (argued), Joseph Donley, Kittredge, Kaufman & Donley, Philadelphia, Pa., for William Butler, Theresa Butler, Marvin L. Simpson, Allen K. Simpson, Karen R. Simpson, Donald E. Simpson and Bryan M. Jackson, appellants.
Charlotte E. Thomas, Arnold E. Cohen (argued), John H. Spelman, Andrew O. Schiff, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg, Ellers & Weir, and Harold E. Kohn, Joseph C. Kohn, Kohn, Savett, Klein & Graf, Philadelphia, Pa., for Mabel Brown, Andre Williams, Sr., Helen V. Narcise, Mary Alice Knight, John and Patricia Ingram, Matthew and Bessie Cunningham, George Albert Burrell, Priscilla Etheridge, Wallace Darryl Cummins, K. Louise Jones, Charles W. Stanbach, appellants.
Michael H. Malin (argued), James D. Shomper, Jeanne Proko-Elkins, White and Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., for Monsanto Co., appell...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation
... ... a preliminary matter that it regards claims in the nature of those sought ( see, e.g., In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation, 916 F.2d 829, 852 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 ... ...
-
Dougan v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp.
... ... 37 medical monitoring test outlined in In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation , 916 F.2d 829, 852 (3d Cir. 1990), cert ... ...
-
Arawana Mills Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
... ... See, e.g., In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation, 916 F.2d 829, 835 n. 1 (3d Cir.1990) (court ... ...
-
O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
... ... groups are prepared entirely outside the context of ongoing litigation, they provide an unusually objective statement of the known science in ... may cite as the basis of his opinion anything he likes." In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig., 706 F.Supp. 358, 368 (E.D.Pa. 1988), rev'd on ... ...
-
Table of Cases
...135 F.R.D. 75 (D. Me. 1991), §4:111.2 In re Oxycontin Antitrust Litig. , 04-md-1603-SHS (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2011), Form 7-48 In re Paoli , 916 F.2d 829 (3rd Cir. 1990), §7:99 In re Penn Central Comm. Paper Litig ., 61 F.R.D. 453, 458 (S.D.N.Y. 1973), §4:70 In re Pincombe , 256 B.R. 774 (N.D.......
-
CHAPTER 9 SPECIAL TOPICS IN TOXIC TORTS: CLASSES, DAMAGES AND FORMS OF RELIEF
...Intern., Inc., 663 F. Supp. 727 (E.D. Pa. 1987) (present physical injury must be shown to establish claim for medical monitoring). [51] 916 F.2d 829 (3d Cir. 1990) reversing and remanding 706 F. Supp. 358 (E.D. Pa 1988). See also on remand In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litigation, 811 F. Supp. ......
-
Selecting Your Expert
...on causation. Most cases fall between the two extreme hypotheticals. In this middle area, Daubert and In re Paoli R.R. Yard PCB Litig ., 916 F. 2d 829, 860 (3d Cir. 1990) require a physician to rely on definitive published studies before concluding that exposure to a particular object or ch......
-
Attacking the Opposing Expert
...summary judgment make certain that the court specify precisely the expert’s data that is unreliable. In re Paoli R. Yard PCB Litigation, 916 F.2d 829 (3rd Cir. 1990) was a toxic tort case in which numerous plaintiffs working or living near a rail yard sought damage allegedly resulting from ......