Parker v. Heckler

Decision Date25 September 1985
Docket NumberNos. 84-7678,84-8630,s. 84-7678
PartiesNelda A. PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee Autry R. HAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

James A. Turner, Turner, Turner & Turner, Tuscaloosa, Ala., for plaintiff-appellant Parker.

Frank W. Donaldson, U.S. Atty., Mary P. Thornton, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant-appellee in No. 84-7678.

William I. Aynes, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant Hand.

Amy D. Levin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee in No. 84-8630.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion (84-7678) June 25, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 763 F.2d

1363)

(Opinion (84-8630) June 4, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 761 F.2d

1545)

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panels' opinions are hereby VACATED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
90 cases
  • Parker v. Bowen
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • May 13, 1986
    ...past work as a security guard. Hand v. Heckler, 761 F.2d 1545, 1547-49 (11th Cir.), vacated for reh'g en banc sub nom. Parker v. Heckler, 774 F.2d 428 (11th Cir.1985). In reaching this conclusion, the panel held that since the Appeals Council has the power to review de novo and reverse the ......
  • Mayweather v. Soc. Sec. Admin.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • March 22, 2022
    ... ... supported by substantial evidence. See Martin , 894 ... F.2d at 1529 (citing Bloodsworth v. Heckler , 703 ... F.2d 1233, 1239 (11th Cir. 1983)) ... Substantial ... evidence falls somewhere between a scintilla and a ... ...
  • Lewis v. Soc. Sec. Admin.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • March 24, 2022
    ... ... prevent an administrative agency's finding from being ... supported by substantial evidence'” Parker v ... Bowen , 793 F.2d 1177, 1181 (11th Cir. 1986) (Gibson, J., ... dissenting) (quoting Consolo v. Fed. Mar ... Comm'n , 383 ... Bridges v. Bowen , 815 F.2d 622, 624 (11th Cir. 1987) ... (citing Arnold v. Heckler , 732 F.2d 881, 883 (11th ... Cir. 1984)). Moreover, failure to apply the correct legal ... standards is grounds for reversal. Bowen v ... ...
  • Owens v. Berryhill
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • September 17, 2018
    ...supported by substantial evidence. See Hand v. Heckler, 761 F.2d 1545, 1548-49 (11th Cir. 1985), vacated for rehearing en banc, 774 F.2d 428 (11th Cir. 1985), reinstated sub nom. Hand v. Bowen, 793 F.2d 275 (11th Cir. 1986). In this case, the ALJ properly followed the two-step process in as......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT