Parker v. Leach
Decision Date | 13 March 1891 |
Citation | 31 A. 19,66 N.H. 416 |
Parties | PARKER et al. v. LEACH et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Bill by Walter M. Parker and David S. Leach, executors, against Charles W. Leach and others, for direction of construction of a will.
The plaintiffs are executors of the will of David S. Leach, made April 24, 1877, which contained, among others, the following bequests: January 19, 1878, the testator made a codicil to his will, containing the following: The residuary clause gave all of the estate undisposed of to the trustees of funds for a certain charity, upon condition that the trustees should serve without compensation in the execution of their trust. And in case of the failure of said legacy by reason of that condition the residue is given to another charity. David R. Leach is living, 51 years of age, and married. There have been born to him eight children, both sons and daughters. One, born February 25, 1876, died shortly after birth; one, George B. Leach, born November 8, 1863, died November 24, 1878. The testator died April 1, 1878. One child—a daughter—has been born to David R. Leach since the testator's death. The executors have performed all the duties imposed upon them, except the payment of the legacies to such of the sons and daughters of David R. Leach as have not attained the age of 21 years, and such as may hereafter be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crawford v. Carlisle
...at the death of the testator in the children of A. then living, and in all his after-born children as soon as they are born. Parker v. Leach, 66 N.H. 416, 31 A. 19. Where the devise to the children whom A., the parent, leave, is to go over in case none of them shall reach 21, and in case no......
- Herndon v. Salt Lake City
-
In re Nicholson's Will
...v. Slade, 155 Mass. 415 (29 N.E. 631); Bray v. Pullen, 84 Me. 185 (24 A. 811); Strong v. Smith, 84 Mich. 567 (48 N.W. 183); Parker v. Leach, 66 N.H. 416 (31 A. 19); In re Bradley's Estate, 166 Pa. 300 (31 A. Jones v. Hunt, 96 Tenn. 369 (34 S.W. 693); Wildberger v. Cheek's Ex'rs, 94 Va. 517 ......
-
In re Earle's Estate
... ... v. Howald, 1899, 120 Mich. 274, 79 N.W. 182; ... Attorney General v. Crispin, 1 Bro.C.C. 386, 28 ... Eng.Reprint 1192 (1784); Parker v. Leach, 1890, 66 ... N.H. 416, 31 A. 19; 3 Jarman on Wills, 7th Ed. 1640 ... Judge ... Bolger in his dissenting opinion calls ... ...