Parker v. Oklahoma, 03-6138.
| Decision Date | 03 November 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 03-6138.,03-6138. |
| Citation | 540 U.S. 978 |
| Parties | PARKER v. OKLAHOMA. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Appeal from the Ct. Crim. App. Okla.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Parker v. Crow, Case No. 20-CV-0125-GKF-JFJ
...stating that petitioner "is cautioned to refrain from further filings pursuant to § 2241 which are patently without merit"); Parker v. Oklahoma, 540 U.S. 978 (2003) (mem.) ("As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions i......
-
Parker v. Allbaugh
...the Court found his litigation tactics abusive. To prevent Plaintiff from engaging in more abusive filing, the Court, in Parker v. Oklahoma, 540 U.S. 978 (2003), issued an Order ("2003 Order") directing the Clerk to reject Plaintiff's future petitions in noncriminal matters unless he paid t......
-
Parker v. Province, 10-6143
...of the judicial system has been noted not only by the Oklahoma courts, but by the United States Supreme court as well. See Parker v. Oklahoma, 540 U.S. 978 (2003) ("As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncrim......