Parks v. Persels & Assocs., LLC (In re Kinderknecht), Bankruptcy No. 09–13443.
Decision Date | 13 April 2012 |
Docket Number | Adversary No. 10–5209.,Bankruptcy No. 09–13443. |
Parties | In re Levi A. KINDERKNECHT, Debtor. Linda S. Parks, Trustee, Plaintiff, Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Intervenor v. Persels and Associates, LLC and Stan Goodwin, Defendants. |
Court | United States Bankruptcy Courts. Tenth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Kansas |
470 B.R. 149
In re Levi A. KINDERKNECHT, Debtor.Linda S. Parks, Trustee, Plaintiff,Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Intervenor
v.Persels and Associates, LLC and Stan Goodwin, Defendants.
Bankruptcy No. 09–13443.
Adversary No. 10–5209.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas.
April 13, 2012.
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Gaye B. Tibbets, Rachel E. Lomas, Hite Fanning and Honeyman LLP, Wichita, KS, for Plaintiff.
Christopher M. Joseph, Joseph & Hollander LLC, Topeka, KS, W. Thomas Gilman, Wichita, KS, for Defendants.
Derenda J. Mitchell, Kansas Attorney General, Topeka, KS, for Intervenor.
ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Judge.
+-------------------+ ¦TABLE OF CONTENTS ¦ +-------------------+
+------+ ¦¦¦¦¦ ¦¦ +------+
+---------------------------------------------------+ ¦I.¦Uncontroverted Facts ¦157 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦A. ¦The Players and Persels' Debt Settlement Business Model ¦157 ¦ +---+----+-------------------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦B. ¦Kinderknecht's Enrollment in Debt Settlement Plan and ¦159 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Retention of Persels Law Firm ¦ ¦ +---+----+-------------------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦C. ¦Kinderknecht's Performance of Debt Settlement Plan and ¦163 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Persels' Representation ¦ ¦ +---+----+-------------------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦D. ¦Kinderknecht Sued by Citibank and Termination of Debt ¦164 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Settlement Plan ¦ ¦ +---+----+-------------------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦E. ¦The Bankruptcy Trustee Sues Persels and Goodwin and ¦164 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Procedural History of Case ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----+----------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦II. ¦Jurisdiction ¦165 ¦ +----+----------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----+----------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦III.¦Applicable Summary Judgment Standards ¦166 ¦ +----+----------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +----+----------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦ ¦IV. ¦Analysis and Conclusions of Law ¦167 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦A. ¦Kansas Credit Services Organization Act [KCSOA] Claims¦167 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Goodwin and Persels are not entitled to summary ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦judgment on the KCSOA claims by virtue of the attorney ¦167 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦exemption in § 50–1116(b) ¦ ¦ +---+----+----+-------------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Defendants' violation of the KCSOA is, as a matter of ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦law, also a deceptive act or practice under the Kansas ¦169 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Consumer Protection Act ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦B. ¦Fraudulent Transfer Claim, 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1)(B)¦169 ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Whether Kinderknecht received less than reasonably ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦equivalent value in exchange for his $915 transfer to ¦169 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Persels cannot be determined as a matter of law on this¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦summary judgment record ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦C.¦Disgorgement of Attorney Fees ¦171¦ +------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦The Court cannot conclude as a matter of law that ¦171 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Persels' and and Goodwin's “legal fees” were reasonable¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦D.¦Legal Malpractice ¦171¦ +------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Summary judgment must be denied where the “common ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦knowledge exception” may apply to the trustee's legal ¦172 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦malpractice claim under the factual circumstances ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦E.¦Breach of Fiduciary Duty ¦173¦ +------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Reasonable persons could draw different conclusion s ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦whether Persels and Goodwin breached their fiduciary ¦173 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦duty to Kinderknecht and therefore, summary judgment is¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦inappropriate ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦F. ¦Kansas Consumer Protection Act [KCPA] Claims¦173 ¦ +---------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦Persels and Goodwin are “suppliers” and subject to the ¦173 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦provisions of the KCPA ¦ ¦ +---+----+----+-------------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦Deceptive Acts or Practices, § 50–626 ¦175 ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a. ¦some, but not all, of the “knowing ¦175 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦misrepresentation” claims, § 50–626(b)(1) ¦ ¦ +---+----+----+---+---------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦some, but not all, of the “representations ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦b. ¦willfully using exaggeration, falsehood, innuendo, ¦177 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦or ambiguity as to a material fact” claims, § ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦50–626(b)(2) ¦ ¦ +---+----+----+---+---------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦c. ¦some, but not all, of the “willful omission of a ¦177 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦material fact” claims, § 50–626(b)(3) ¦ ¦ +---+----+----+---+---------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦d. ¦some, but not all, of the remaining deceptive act ¦179 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦claims under § 50–626(b) ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Defendants are not entitled to summary judgment on the ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦3. ¦KCPA unconscionability claims where there is sufficient¦180 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦evidence in the record of unconscionable conduct ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦G. ¦Constitutionality of the KCPA, the KCSOA, and the KCSOA's ¦182 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Attorney Exemption ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦1. ¦The KCPA and the KCSOA do not violate the separation of¦183 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦powers doctrine ¦ ¦ +---+----+----+-------------------------------------------------------+------¦ ¦ ¦ ¦2. ¦The KCSOA attorney exemption statute, § 50–1116(b), is ¦184 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦not unconstitutionally vague as applied to Persels ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+---------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ +--+-------------------------------------------+----¦ ¦V.¦Summary ¦185 ¦...
To continue reading
Request your trialSubscribers can access the reported version of this case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a list of all the cited cases and legislation of a document.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a list of all the documents that have cited the case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see the revised versions of legislation with amendments.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see any amendments made to the case.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see a visualisation of a case and its relationships to other cases. An alternative to lists of cases, the Precedent Map makes it easier to establish which ones may be of most relevance to your research and prioritise further reading. You also get a useful overview of how the case was received.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
Subscribers are able to see the list of results connected to your document through the topics and citations Vincent found.
You can sign up for a trial and make the most of our service including these benefits.
Why Sign-up to vLex?
-
Over 100 Countries
Search over 120 million documents from over 100 countries including primary and secondary collections of legislation, case law, regulations, practical law, news, forms and contracts, books, journals, and more.
-
Thousands of Data Sources
Updated daily, vLex brings together legal information from over 750 publishing partners, providing access to over 2,500 legal and news sources from the world’s leading publishers.
-
Find What You Need, Quickly
Advanced A.I. technology developed exclusively by vLex editorially enriches legal information to make it accessible, with instant translation into 14 languages for enhanced discoverability and comparative research.
-
Over 2 million registered users
Founded over 20 years ago, vLex provides a first-class and comprehensive service for lawyers, law firms, government departments, and law schools around the world.
-
Wagner v. Pruett (In re Vaughan Co.)
- United States
- United States Bankruptcy Courts. Tenth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Mexico
- August 2, 2012
-
Wagner v. Pruett (In re Vaughan Co.)
- United States
- United States Bankruptcy Courts. Tenth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Mexico
- August 2, 2012
-
Wagner v. Galbreth
- United States
- U.S. District Court — District of New Mexico
- September 30, 2013
-
Persels & Assocs., LLC v. Banking Comm'r, 19359.
- United States
- Connecticut Supreme Court
- September 15, 2015