Parlor Car Deluxe Coach Co. v. Atl. City
Decision Date | 03 February 1930 |
Docket Number | No. 24.,24. |
Parties | PARLOR CAR DELUXE COACH CO., Appellant v. ATLANTIC CITY, Respondent. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Cole & Cole, of Atlantic City, for appellant.
Joseph B. Perskie, of Atlantic City, for respondent.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court, People's Rapid Transit Co. v. Atlantic City, 144 A. 630.
For Affirmance: THE CHANCELLOR, The CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, Judges VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, and DEAR.
For Reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cedar Grove Tp. v. Sheridan
...Transit Co. v. Atlantic City, 105 N.J.L. 286, 291, 144 A. 630 (Sup.Ct.1929), aff'd o.b. sub. nom. Parlor Car De Luxe Coach Co. v. Atlantic City, 106 N.J.L. 587, 149 A. 893 (E. & A. 1930); accord Samuel Braen, Inc. v. Waldwick, 28 N.J. 476, 481, 147 A.2d 40 (1958). Municipalities may legisla......
-
Mister Softee v. Mayor and Council of City of Hoboken
...Peoples Rapid Transit v. Atlantic City, 105 N.J.L. 286, 144 A. 630, 633 (Sup.Ct.1929), affirmed Parlor Car De Luxe Coach Co. v. Atlantic City, 106 N.J.L. 587, 149 A. 893 (E. & A.1930).' (at p. 440, 74 A.2d at p. A city ordinance in New York that prohibited the selling of ice cream and confe......
- Blumenthal v. City of Cheyenne
-
Town of Nutley v. Forney
...Peoples Rapid Transit v. Atlantic City, 105 N.J.L. 286, 144 A. 630 (Sup.Ct.1929), aff'd, Parlor Car DeLuxe Coach Co. v. Atlantic City, 106 N.J.L. 587, 149 A. 893 (E. & A.1930); Newark v. Charlton Holding Co., 9 N.J.Super. 433, 74 A.2d 641 (Cty.Ct.1950). All such questions of policy, wisdom ......