Passman v. Guarantee Trust & Safe-Deposit Co.
Decision Date | 15 December 1898 |
Citation | 41 A. 953,57 N.J.E. 273 |
Parties | PASSMAN et al. v. GUARANTEE TRUST & SAFE-DEPOSIT CO. et al. |
Court | New Jersey Court of Chancery |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Bill by Elizabeth Passman and others against the Guarantee Trust & Safe-Deposit Company and others. Decree for complainants.
This bill is filed by the complainants, one of whom claims to be the owner of two twenty-second parts, and the other of nine twenty-second parts, of the residuary estate of one Thomas Costello, who died in the year 1877. The testator had made his will, dated December 24, 1875, which was proven on the 31st day of August, 1877, before the register of wills of the county of Philadelphia, Pa., where the testator was domiciled at the time of his death. An exemplified copy of the will has been filed in the office of the surrogate of Atlantic county, under the provisions of the New Jersey statute. By the terms of his will, the testator, Thomas Costello, directed the payment of his debts. He gave general money legacies, annuities, and special devises, and then disposed of the residue of his estate by the following provisions:
The testator, at the time of his death, was seised in fee of a tract of land in Atlantic City, N. J., at the northwest corner of Atlantic and Maryland avenues. The property passed under the above-quoted residuary clause of his will. The buildings on this property have become so decayed and weatherworn that they are scarcely tenantable, and are now so entirely dilapidated that they are not worth repairing. The lot of land, however, is valued at from fourteen to fifteen thousand dollars, irrespective of the worth of any buildings thereon. The executors and trustees named in the will have both died since they proved the will, and the defendant the Guarantee Trust & Safe-Deposit Company has been appointed trustee in their place and stead. The ownership of the several interests has been changed by death and transfer. The Guarantee Trust & Safe-Deposit Company, as trustee of the other present holders of the shares, and the executors of the deceased trustees, have been made defendants. The complainant alleges that the Guarantee Trust & Safe-Deposit Company has, as trustee, assumed the possession of the premises, and taken the rents and income therefrom, and that it is also proceeding to enforce the trust under the will of Thomas Costello. The complainants declare this action creates a cloud upon the title to the premises, and contend that the trust provision is illegal, because it seeks to create a trust in perpetuity; and they allege that they and the defendants are the absolute owners in fee simple of the lands and premises passing under the residuary estate of the testator, in the following shares and proportions: Elizabeth Passman, complainant, two twenty-second parts; Charles C. Babcock, complainant, nine twenty-second...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People of the State of New York Cohn v. Graves
...of the legal interest. See Paletz v. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 109 N.J.Eq. 344, 157 A. 456; cf. Passman v. Guarantee Trust & Safe-Deposit Co., 57 N.J.Eq. 273, 41 A. 953; Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman, 97 N.J.Eq. 140, 128 A. 791. Any uncertainty arising from the ambiguity of the stip......
-
Duane v. Stevens
...* * * The same rule applies whether the gift be direct or through the intervention of a trustee.’ Passman v. Guarantee Trust and Safe-Deposit Co., 57 N.J.Eq. 273, 41 A. 953, 954. In substantial concurrence are, Gulick v. Gulick's Executors, 27 N.J.Eq. 498; Miers v. Persons, 92 N.J.Eq. 17, 1......
-
Walter v. Dickmann
...to pay the "net income" to the beneficiaries, "their heirs and assigns forever," the court, after stating the rule as above mentioned, said (p. 276): "The same rule applies whether the gift direct or through the intervention of a trustee." And on page 277: "The operation of the rule is not ......
-
Skovborg v. Smith
...Cf. Post v. Herbert's Executors, 27 N.J.Eq. 540 (E. & A.1876). True, the rule was enunciated in Passman v. Guarantee Trust and Safe Deposit Co., 57 N.J.Eq. 273, 41 A. 953, 954 (Ch.1898) that 'the bequest of the income without limit as to time, or gift over which can operate, is a bequest of......