Pastrana v. Baker

Citation430 N.Y.S.2d 145,77 A.D.2d 653
PartiesIn the Matter of Peter PASTRANA, Petitioner, v. Edward A. BAKER, County Court Justice etc., et al., Respondents.
Decision Date28 July 1980
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Harold Borg, Kew Gardens (Abraham Hecht, Forest Hills, and Herbert Lyon, Kew Gardens, of counsel), for petitioner.

Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (Bruce A. Smirti, Williston Park, of counsel), respondent pro se and for respondent Baker.

Before DAMIANI, J. P., and COHALAN, MARTUSCELLO and WEINSTEIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit respondents from retrying petitioner for the crime of assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 48006.

Proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

In 1978 petitioner was indicted for assault in the first degree (two counts) and assault in the second degree, after allegedly having struck another in the face with a broken beverage glass. At the conclusion of the trial the court submitted two counts to the jury, assault in the first degree (intentionally causing serious physical injury to another) and assault in the second degree (recklessly causing serious physical injury to another). After considerable deliberation, the forelady informed the court by written note that the jury had "reached a not guilty verdict on the assault in the first degree charge" and added, "We are deadlocked on the assault in the second degree charge." The trial court then dismissed the jury, stating that "an acquittal on the first charge is an acquittal of both charges", and ordered petitioner discharged and bail exonerated.

Some weeks later, the court clerk recalled the underlying action. Petitioner's attorney stated that the court had ordered his client discharged, to which the Trial Judge replied that the acquittal order on the assault in the second degree count would be vacated on the People's application. He acknowledged that it had been a mistake to discharge the petitioner, since "the elements of the two counts were completely different" and "(t)here was no merger." The Trial Judge set the case down for trial on the assault in the second degree charge. Thereafter, petitioner commenced this proceeding to prohibit his retrial on the ground of former jeopardy.

The discharge of a jury rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and does not bar a second trial, if, under all the circumstances, "there is a manifest necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated" (United States v. Perez, 9 Wheat. (22 U.S.) 579, 580, 6 L.Ed. 165; see, also, People v. Michael, 48 N.Y.2d 1, 9, 420 N.Y.S.2d 371, 394 N.E.2d 1134).

The jurors had deliberated for some 191/2 hours (less meal and sleep periods) before informing the court of their deadlock. They then deliberated for another half hour before again volunteering that they were deadlocked on the second degree assault count. On this record, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in discharging the jury and accepting a partial verdict (CPL 310.70, subd. 1, par. (a); see Arizona v. Washington, 434 U.S. 497, 516-517, 98 S.Ct. 824, 836, 54 L.Ed.2d 717).

Although a judgment of acquittal bars retrial for the same offense (CPL 40.20, subd. 1; United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co., 430 U.S. 564, 571-572, 97 S.Ct. 1349, 1355, 51 L.Ed.2d 642; People v. Brown, 40 N.Y.2d 381, 386, 386 N.Y.S.2d 848, 353 N.E.2d 811, cert. den. 429 U.S. 975, 97 S.Ct. 482, 51 L.Ed.2d 583, mot. for rearg. den. 42 N.Y.2d 1015, 398 N.Y.S.2d 1034, 368 N.E.2d 289, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Nelson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 15 Febrero 1985
    ...It is clear that a "dismissal without legal basis or justification" can be rectified by a trial court (Matter of Pastrana v. Baker, 77 A.D.2d 653, 654, 430 N.Y.S.2d 145 [2d Dept.1980], affd. 55 N.Y.2d 315, 449 N.Y.S.2d 461, 434 N.E.2d 697 [1982] ). Defendants' reliance upon the memorandum d......
  • People v. Warren
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 Marzo 1981
    ...den. 47 N.Y.2d 709, 419 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 393 N.E.2d 491; cf. People v. Boynton, 67 A.D.2d 982, 413 N.Y.S.2d 431; Matter of Pastrana v. Baker, 77 A.D.2d 653, 430 N.Y.S.2d 145). ...
  • Pastrana v. Baker
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 1 Abril 1982
    ...on the greater count required the same result on the lesser. The order of the Appellate Division, therefore, should be affirmed, 77 A.D.2d 653, 430 N.Y.S.2d 145. Petitioner was charged with assault. Two counts of the indictment were submitted to the jury: count one for assault in the first ......
  • Pastrana v. Baker
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 22 Diciembre 1980
    ...1025 437 N.Y.S.2d 1025 52 N.Y.2d 702, 418 N.E.2d 679 Pastrana v. Baker COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK Dec 22, 1980 430 N.Y.S.2d 145, 77 A.D.2d 653 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL Granted. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT