Pataky v. Pataky, 571A03.
| Citation | 602 S.E.2d 360,359 N.C. 65 |
| Decision Date | 07 October 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 571A03.,571A03. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Diana Mae PATAKY v. Kenneth PATAKY. |
Nix & Cecil, by Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for plaintiff-appellant.
Joyce L. Terres, High Point, for defendant-appellee.
As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
14 cases
-
Balawejder v. Balawejder
... ... Pataky v. Pataky, 160 N.C.App. 289, 30607, 585 S.E.2d 404, 41516 (2003), affirm per curium, 359 N.C ... ...
-
Weisberg v. Griffith, No. COA04-380 (NC 7/19/2005)
... ... Boyd, 81 N.C. App. 71, 76, 343 S.E.2d 581, 585 (1986). In Pataky v. Pataky, 160 N.C. App. 289, 585 S.E.2d 404 (2003), aff'd per curiam, 359 N.C. 65, 602 S.E.2d ... ...
-
Head v. Mosier
... ... , a court may make its own motion if it makes required findings, 2006 Guidelines; see Pataky v. Pataky, 160 N.C.App ... 677 S.E.2d 198 ... 289, 296, 585 S.E.2d 404, 409 (2003), aff'd, disc ... ...
-
Walton v. Walton
... ... , without more, to support a finding of deliberate income depression or bad faith." Pataky v. Pataky , 160 N.C. App. 289, 307, 585 S.E.2d 404, 416 (2003) (citations omitted), aff'd in part, ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results