Patek v. Alfaro (In re Primera Energy, LLC)

Decision Date29 December 2017
Docket NumberADVERSARY NO. 15–05047–CAG,CASE NO. 15–51396–CAG
Citation579 B.R. 75
Parties IN RE: PRIMERA ENERGY, LLC, Debtor. Frederick Patek; Geraldine Patek; Jasper Compise; William Crawford; Micahel Covington; Rick Griffey; Ed McPherson; Dieter Jansen; Quackenbush Petroleum LLC; James Reiley; Betty Reiley; Rick Reiley; Vincent J. Gillette; Marjorie A. Gillette; Thomas J. Gillette; Edward A. Gillette; Sharon Walls ; Buddy Walls; DC Oil Company, Inc.; Buford Salmon; Lillian Salmon; Joseph Hart ; Brian Huber; David Davalos; Daniel Davalos ; Frederick Johnston ; Milan Knezovich 11; Fountaingates Investment Group; James Peters; and Broc Yakel, Plaintiffs, v. Brian K. Alfaro; King Minerals, LLC ; Silver Star Resources, LLC ; 430 Assets, LLC, A Montana LLC; Kristi Michelle Alfaro; Brian and Kristi Alfaro, as Trustees of the Brian and Kristi Alfaro Living Trust; and Ana and Avery's Candy Island, LLC, Defendants.
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — Western District of Texas

Brandon Barchus, Ashely M. Hymel, Faulk Barchus PLLC, Houston, TX, Lawrence Morales, II, Natalie F. Wilson, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiffs.

J. Mitchell Little, Patrick J. Schurr, Scheef & Stone, LLP, Frisco, TX, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CRAIG A. GARGOTTA, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

This Memorandum Opinion resolves the above-referenced adversary proceeding in which the Court conducted a six day trial on April 10–13 & 17–18, 2017, before taking the matter under advisement.The Court has reviewed the entire record before it; including all admitted exhibits and the weight of testimony and credibility of all witnesses.Additionally, the Court has carefully considered all evidentiary objections raised and sustained in making its findings of fact.

CONTENTS

ProceduralBackground...88

Jurisdiction, Authority and Venue...89

ReliefRequested...90

Parties'Contentions...90

II.Defendants'Contentions...92

EvidencePresented...94

I.Preliminary Injunction Hearing and Exhibits...94
II.Trial and Exhibits...94
IV.FactualFindings...99
A. Corporation and TrustFormation...99
B.Well Drilling and Distributions...100
1.MontagueLegacy...100
2.Screaming Eagle ...100
3.Blackhawk Buda ...100
C. State CourtActivities...100
1.Tejas TubularSuit...100
2.Acute Safety Suit ...100
3.Key EnergySuit...100
4.Unit Texas DrillingSuit...100
5.Energy FishingSuit...100
6.Platinum Energy Suit ...100
7.Qwik PipeSuit...100
8.American Oilfield and Tejas TransportSuit...101
9.Brennan ShortSuit...101
D. Plaintiffs...101
1.Questions Asked to Plaintiffs...101
2.The GoverningWriting...102
3.James Peters ...102
4.Richard DavidCollins...103
5.James "Buford"Salmon...104
6.WilliamL. Crawford...105
7.DavidDavalos...106
8.DanielDavalos...106
9.RickReiley...107
10.JamesReiley...108
11.BettyReiley...109
12.DieterJansen...110
13.VincentJ. Gillette...111
14.BrianHuber...113
15.SharonWalls...115
16.RickGriffey...116
17.Marjorie A.Gillette...117
18.ThomasJ. Gillette...118
19.Edward A.Gillette...119
20.MichaelCovington...119
21.MeganBlair...122
E. Defendants...123
1.Brian Alfaro—Preliminary Injunction HearingTestimony...123
a. Testimony Regarding Primera's InvestmentProcess...124
b. Testimony Specific to the Screaming Eagle4H Well...125
c. Testimony Regarding the FINRA Investigation and Contract Statements ...126
d. Testimony Regarding the InvestmentProcess...126
e. Testimony Regarding the GilletteGroup...128
f. Testimony Regarding Commissions, Management Fee, and VendorPayments...129
2.Brian Alfaro—TrialTestimony...130
a. Testimony Regarding the Subscription Agreement and PPM...130
b. Testimony Regarding Bankruptcy Filing and TRO...130
c. Issues with Investments and Wells ...131
d. Testimony Regarding Alfaro's PersonalFinancials...131
e. Testimony Regarding Silver StarResources...132
3.KristiAlfaro...132
F. Primera Employees and Michael Turner ...133
1.JustinRodriguez...133
2.MichaelPerkins...133
3.Edgar Perez–Mendez...134
4.TimHundley...136
5.SoniaJimenez...136
6.CodyReyes...136
7.MichaelTurner...137
V.Miscellaneous Evidence Presented ...137

Analysis of Plaintiffs' claims...138

I.Common Law Fraud and Fraud in the Inducement ...138

A.Breach of Contract or Fraudulent Inducement?...138
1.May Plaintiffs' Recover Under Fraudulent Inducement? ...139
2.Does the Statute of Fraud Preclude Plaintiffs' Claims Based on Oral Representations? ...141
B. Plaintiffs' FraudClaims...143
1.Material False Representations ...144
a. Use of investor funds for well drilling and completion as allocated in the Contracts ...145
b. ManagementFees...145
c.Commission-basedPayments...145
2.Knowledge of Falsity or RecklessAssertion...146
a. Use of Investor Funds for Well Drilling and Completion...146
b. ManagementFees...148
c. Commission–BasedPayment...148
3.Intent to Induce Reliance ...150
4.Actual and Justifiable Reliance CausingInjury...150
a. Did the Contracts Contain "Red Flags" That Should Have Put Plaintiffs on Notice to Make Further Inquiries?...159
C. Fraud-in-the-inducement...160

II.Fraud in a Real Estate Transaction ...161

III.NegligentMisrepresentation...162

IV.Deceptive Trade Practices Act...164

A.The Working Interest ...165
B. OperatorServices...166

V.Violation of Texas Securities Laws ...168

VI.Conversion ...169

A.Personal Property Comprising the Screaming Eagle 1H Well ...169
B.Rights to a Proportionate Right of the Production of Oil, Gas, and Other Minerals from the Screaming Eagle 1H well...170
C.Rights to Investments in the Working interests ...170

VII.Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act Claims ...171

A.Plaintiffs' Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act Claims ...171
B. Plaintiff'sTUFTA Remedies...179
1.ConstructiveTrust...180
2.EquitableLien...182

VIII.Unjust Enrichment ...183

IX.Money Had and Received...184

X.Civil Conspiracy ...184

Remedies...185

A. Damages...186
B. ConstructiveTrust...187
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing their lawsuit styled Frederick Patek, Geraldine Patek, Jim Gregory, Cal Curtner, Lisa Simpson, Jasper Campise, Karen Smith, William Crawford, Mike Covington, Marc Keese, Mike McPherson, Ed McPherson, Wesley Crow, Dieter Jansen, Quackenbush Petroleum, James Reiley, Betty Reiley, Rick Reiley, Greg Shilts and Jana Shilts and on behalf of All Other Similarly Situated Investors of Defendants' "Screaming Eagle,""Montague Legacy" and "Buda Well" Investments vs. Brian K. Alfaro, Primera Energy, LLC, Alfaro Oil and Gas, LLC and Alfaro Energy, LLC , in the 288th District Court for Bexar County on April 24, 2015(the "State Court Action").

In the State Court Action, Plaintiffs sought and obtained a temporary restraining order ("TRO") against Brian Alfaro("Alfaro"), Primera Energy, LLC("Primera"), Alfaro Oil and Gas, LLC("Alfaro O & G") and Alfaro Energy, LLC("Alfaro Energy") on April 28, 2015.The TRO expired on May 12, 2015, and on May 19, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion to extend the TRO.On May 22, 2015, the TRO was extended to June 1, 2015.On June 2, 2015, the state court judge entered a temporary injunction against Defendants Alfaro, Primera, Alfaro O & G and Alfaro Energy.1

On June 3, 2015, Primera filed for relief under Title 11 of the U.S. Code commencing BankruptcyCase No. 15–51396(the "Bankruptcy Case").On June 19, 2015, Alfaro, Primera, Alfaro O & G, Alfaro Energy, King Minerals, LLC("King") and Silver Star Resources, LLC("Silver Star") removed the State Court Action to this Court, commencing this Adversary ProceedingNo. 15–05047(the "Adversary").Also on June 19, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Petition in the State Court Action adding King and Silver Star as Defendants.

On July 13, 2015, Jason Searcy was appointed chapter 11trustee for the estate of Primera in the Bankruptcy Case.On August 11, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary and Permanent Injunctions(Adv. ECF No. 22)(the "Application") in this Adversary, seeking relief against Alfaro, Primera, Alfaro O & G, Alfaro Energy, King and Silver Star.On August 14, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 29) in this Adversary adding the following Defendants in their Third Amended Complaint: 430 Assets, LLC("430 Assets"); Kristi Michelle Alfaro("Kristi Alfaro"); Brian Alfaro and Kristi Alfaro, as trustees for the Brian and Kristi Alfaro Living Trust ("Living Trust"); and Ana and Averys Candy Island, LLC("Candy Island").

The Court held a hearing on the Application over the following five days: August 28, 2015; September 1, 2015; September 2, 2015; September 4, 2015; and September 15, 2015.The Court issued its Order Denying Plaintiffs' Application for Preliminary Injunction(ECF No. 98) on October 28, 2015.In its Order, the Court specifically noted that the Order only referenced those Defendants who were named in the Application to the Court and excluded those Defendants who had been added in later amended Complaints.Thus, the Order referred only to Defendants Alfaro, Primera, Alfaro O & G and Alfaro Energy.

On March 21, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Artho v. Happy State Bank (In re Artho)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Texas
    • March 30, 2018
    ...unambiguous terms of a written agreement between the parties is not justified as a matter of law." Patek v. Alfaro (In re Primera Energy, LLC) , 579 B.R. 75, 142 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2017). Nonetheless, a material fact is one that likely affects the conduct of a reasonable person concerning th......
  • Rose v. Aaron (In re Rose)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • September 27, 2019
    ...WL 1614196, at *10 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2018) (citing Chu v. Hong, 249 S.W.3d 441, 444 (Tex. 2008)); In re Primera Energy, LLC, 579 B.R. 75, 185 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2017) ("A civil conspiracy claim may be proved by circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences from parties' actions.......
  • Carol Rose & Carol Rose, Inc. v. Aaron (In re Rose)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Texas
    • January 23, 2019
    ...WL 1614196, at *10 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2018) (citing Chu v. Hong, 249 S.W.3d 441, 444 (Tex. 2008)); In re Primera Energy, LLC, 579 B.R. 75, 185 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2017) ("A civil conspiracy claim may be proved by circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences from parties' actions.......
  • Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB v. Iheartcommunications, Inc. (In re Iheartmedia, Inc.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Texas
    • January 15, 2019
    ...in nature, and Texas law determines their application. In re Wells Fargo Bank Minn. , 115 S.W.3d at 605 n.7 ; In re Primera Energy, LLC , 579 B.R. 75, 182 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2017) ("The Court has found that an equitable lien is a remedy that may be used in conjunction with the imposition of ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Stern Claims and Article Iii Adjudication—the Bankruptcy Judge Knows Best?
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal No. 35-1, March 2019
    • Invalid date
    ...LLC v. GHD, Inc. (In re WTE-S & S Ag. Ents., LLC), 575 B.R. 397, 405 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2017); Patek v. Alfaro (In re Primera Energy, LLC), 579 B.R. 75, 90 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2017); In re HomeBanc Mortg. Corp., 573 B.R. 495, 503 (Bankr. D. Del. 2017); Core Litig. Tr. v. Apollo Glob. Mgmt., LL......
  • OIL AND GAS UPDATE: LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS IN 2018 AFFECTING THE OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INDUSTRY
    • United States
    • FNREL - Journals Oil & Gas Update - Legal Devs. in 2018 Affecting the Oil & Gas Expl. & Prod. Indus. (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...2018, no pet.).[268] 546 S.W.3d 110 (Tex. 2018). [269] Id. at 114.[270] 551 S.W.3d 148 (Tex. 2018).[271] Id. at 150.[272] Id. at 153.[273] 579 B.R. 75 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2017). Note: The Committee's annual update for 2017 did not discuss this opinion due to the opinion's issuance on December......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT