Patel v. Garland
| Docket Number | 20-979 |
| Decision Date | 16 May 2022 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
170 cases
-
Ramirez Garcia v. United States Citizenship
... ... at 6 (emphasis omitted) ... [ 6 ] The court further notes the Supreme ... Court's recent decision in Patel v. Garland , __ ... U.S. __, 142 S.Ct. 1614 (2022). In Patel , the ... Supreme Court considered “how far th[e] bar” set ... by ... ...
-
United States v. Sebastian
... ... 35 (1st Cir. 2022) (explaining that “[t]he word ... ‘any,' in particular, ‘has an ... expansive meaning'” (quoting Patel v ... Garland, 142 S.Ct. 1614, 1622 (2022))). The word ... “any” also does not modify the term “sexual ... act” in either ... ...
-
Mendoza-Linares v. Garland
... ... at 603, 108 S.Ct. 2047 )). In response to St. Cyr and Calcano-Martinez , Congress amended the judicial review provisions in INA § 242 in two key respects. See REAL ID Act, Pub. L. No. 109-13, Div. B, § 106(a), 119 Stat. 302, 310 (2005); see also Patel v. Garland , ––– U.S. ––––, 142 S. Ct. 1614, 1623, 212 L.Ed.2d 685 (2022). First, Congress added clarifying language stating that, except as provided in § 242(e), any use of habeas corpus to challenge removal orders is precluded, and a petition for review in the court of appeals is ... ...
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Shaping Immigration Policy Through Federal Courts
...set aside agency action that is found to be "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law."22. 142 S. Ct. 1614, 1626-27 (2022).23. Section 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii) makes inadmissible a person who "has falsely represented himself or herself to be a citizen ......
-
Statutory Structure.
...and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter Act), ch. 477, 66 Stat. 163 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 8 U.S.C). (364.) 142 S. Ct. 1614 (365.) 8 U.S.C. [section] 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (2018). (366.) Patel, 142 S. Ct. at 1619; see 8 U.S.C. [section] 1255(i) (2018). (367.) Patel, 1......
-
Immigration Law's Missing Presumption
...a social worker had evaluated the petitioner and agreed that he did not commit the acts described in the criminal complaints). 366. 142 S. Ct. 1614, 1627 (2022). 367. See Moncrieffe v. Holder, 569 U.S. 184, 191 (2013) (“‘[C]onviction’ is ‘the relevant statutory hook.’” (alteration in origin......
-
The Adjudicative State.
...(adopting Caleb Nelson's rights taxonomy and classifying "statutory entitlements" as privileges). (108.) See, e.g., Patel v. Garland, 142 S. Ct. 1614, 1636 (2022) (Gorsuch, J., (109.) Baude, supra note 88, at 1578-80. (110). See Gregory Ablavsky, Getting Public Rights Wrong: The Lost Histor......
Get Started for Free