Patterson v. American Nat. Red Cross, Civ. A. No. 4019-M.
Decision Date | 19 December 1951 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 4019-M. |
Citation | 101 F. Supp. 655 |
Parties | PATTERSON et al. v. AMERICAN NAT. RED CROSS. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida |
Hogsten, Levin & Knuck, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs.
Dixon, DeJarnette & Bradford, Miami, Fla., for defendant.
The complaint in this cause was filed by Robert F. Patterson and Delores H. Patterson, citizens of Florida, in the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, against The American National Red Cross. Petition for removal was filed by defendant, The American National Red Cross. The cause now comes on to be heard on the plaintiffs' motion to remand on the following grounds:
The American National Red Cross was created a corporation by Act of Congress.
Title 36 U.S.C.A. § 1 provides, after naming the incorporators: "* * * are created a body corporate and politic in the District of Columbia."
Title 36 U.S.C.A. § 1a, in part reads as follows: "The corporation now existing as The American National Red Cross under sections 1 and 2-16 of this title, shall continue as a body corporate and politic in the District of Columbia."
Title 36 U.S.C.A. § 2, as amended May 8, 1947, now reads in part as follows: "The name of this corporation shall be `The American National Red Cross', and by that name it shall have perpetual succession, with the power to sue and be sued in courts of law and equity, State or Federal, within the jurisdiction of the United States." (Italics the Court's.) It is to be noted that the portion above italicized was amended and changed from the previous provision which read as follows: "* * * with the power to sue and be sued in courts of law and equity within the jurisdiction of the United States." Certainly Congress contemplated suits by or against the defendant in the Federal Courts when enacting the amendment.
Section 1332 of Title 28 U.S.C.A., as it presently reads, expressly provides: "(b) The word `States', as used in this section, includes the Territories and the District of Columbia."
It is true that the defendant has the right to operate and carry on its activities in Florida and all of the States of the United States. However, it is established without question that, for the purpose of jurisdiction in the courts of the United States, a corporation is to be deemed a citizen of the state creating it,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Am. Nat'l Red Cross v. S.G.
...in the "sue and be sued" provision, but rather on party diversity. See Brief for Respondents 29 (citing Patterson v. American National Red Cross, 101 F.Supp. 655 (SD Fla.1951)). However, the Red Cross's failure in one forty year-old case to base its removal petition on the theory it advance......
-
Burton v. United States Olympic Committee
...federal statute incorporating the entity characterized it as a "body corporate" of a particular state, see Patterson v. American National Red Cross, 101 F.Supp. 655 (S.D.Fla.1951).4 In essence, the USOC's argument is that in enacting the 1958 amendment, Congress intended to apply the "princ......
-
Crum v. Veterans of Foreign Wars, Civ. A. No. 80-231.
...statute characterizes the corporation as a "body corporate" of a particular state. See Patterson v. American Nat'l Red Cross, 101 F.Supp. 655 4 For purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title removal, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been inco......
-
Nyberg v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
...of a different state from the plaintiff. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Koontz, above cited." In Patterson v. American National Red Cross, D.C., 101 F.Supp. 655, 656, the court "For the purpose of jurisdiction in the courts of the United States, a corporation is to be deemed a citiz......
-
Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Antitrust and Business Tort Litigation
...2d 940, 941 (D. Neb. 1998) (no diversity jurisdiction because DAV is a national citizen). But see Patterson v. Am. Nat’l Red Cross, 101 F. Supp. 655, 657 (S.D. Fla. 1951) (finding diversity jurisdiction because corporation created by congressional act granting its corporate existence was ci......