Patterson v. City of Bismarck
Decision Date | 23 June 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 8715,8715 |
Citation | 188 N.W.2d 734 |
Parties | Rose PATTERSON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. The CITY OF BISMARCK et al., Defendants and Appellants. Civ. |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1.In the construction of a statute the intention of the lawmakers must be deduced from a view of the whole statute, and of every part thereof taken and compared together.
2.Subsection 5(f) of Section 40--60--02 of the North Dakota Century Code provides the formula under which leases for a parking facility may be offered by a municipality, and does not pertain to the power of financing the facility, and therefore does not prohibit a municipality that has leased out the facilities and has issued bonds from levying taxes or assessing special assessments as a primary source of revenue for the payment of any warrants or bonds which a municipality may have issued in connection with the construction of such a facility.
3.Where it appears from the record that material facts are absent from the record, a new trial may be granted by the Supreme Court under Section 28--27--32, North Dakota Century Code.
Rausch & Chapman, Bismarck, for plaintiffs and respondents.
John A. Zuger, City Atty., City of Bismarck, and Arthur B. Whitney, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendants and appellants.
This appeal is from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in an action in the District Court of Burleigh County to enjoin the collection of certain special assessments levied against the plaintiffs' property in the City of Bismarck.The defendants have requested a trial de novo in the Supreme Court.The project for which the assessments were levied is a parking facility to provide off-street parking facilities for the principal business district of Bismarck, which facility was constructed under the powers granted under Chapter 40--60 of the North Dakota Century Code.
The action to enjoin the collection of the special assessments alleged several grounds as the basis for declaring the special assessments against the properties of the plaintiffs invalid.However, the trial court at the outset of the trial indicated to the parties that it was concerned with the interpretation of Section 40--60--02 subsection 5(f) of the North Dakota Century Code and inquired whether the parties would stipulate that the City of Bismarck issued bonds for the total amount of the cost of the parking facility and that the City of Bismarck leased out all of the parking facility.No reference was made in the stipulation as to the type of bonds that were issued.This stipulation was agreed to by the parties whereupon the court proceeded to a discussion of Section 40--60--02 subsection 5(f) of the North Dakota Century Code indicating to the parties that under this subsection the city, having leased the entire facility, is precluded from levying special assessments.
The defendants thereafter offered as exhibits in evidence all the official proceedings had by the city in connection with this parking facility which the court received.The plaintiffs did not introduce any evidence, but indicated to the court that they had testimony to offer in support of their allegations in the complaint, but would not offer any if the court was prepared to rule on the one issue that the court raised and on that basis rested.The parties thereupon rested and the court issued its decision.
The first issue before this court is whether or not the trial court's decision should be sustained.
The City of Bismarck determined to use the special assessment route as the primary source of financing a combined parking and commercial facility with the provision that the special assessments would be reduced to the extent that rentals would be derived from both the parking and commercial facilities.The plaintiffs in their complaint have challenged this combination method of construction and financing on several grounds, but the trial court did not rule on any of those issues raised.The court, after the parties had stipulated that the City of Bismarck had leased out all of these facilities and had issued bonds for the total cost of construction, concluded that Section 40--60--025(f) North Dakota Century Code, which provides that leases of the facilities must be adequate to pay for the principal and interest for all bonds becoming due during the terms of the leases, precludes a municipality from levying any special assessments.
The State Legislature in 1967 enacted Chapter 40--60 entitled 'Promotion and Acquisition of Municipal Parking Facilities.'The purpose of this legislation is clearly stated in section 40--60--01 North Dakota Century Code, which reads in part:
'* * * The withdrawal of a disproportionate amount of land for this purpose from use for commercial development and from the tax base of municipalities is undesirable and can be avoided, when the growth of business areas makes it economically feasible, by the construction of multi-level parking ramps and garages, and by making the space above, below or adjacent thereto available for commercial development and use.'
Section 40--60--02 North Dakota Century Code grants the power to municipalities to implement the legislative policy declared in Section 40--60--01, and reads as follows:
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Patterson v. City of Bismarck
...followed by the city is not challenged, a detailed discussion of those proceedings is omitted here. Also, our decision in Patterson v. City of Bismarck, Supra, has to a large measure decided the legality of the funding The parkade located at the intersection of Fifth Street and Broadway was......
-
City of Fargo, Cass County v. State
...the intent of the Legislature. Horst v. Guy, 219 N.W.2d 153 (N.D.1974); State v. Hagge, 211 N.W.2d 395 (N.D.1973); Patterson v. City of Bismarck, 188 N.W.2d 734 (N.D.1971). The intent must be derived from the whole statute and of every part thereof taken and compared together. Beck v. Workm......