Patterson v. Lynde
Citation | 106 U.S. 519,27 L.Ed. 265,1 S.Ct. 432 |
Parties | PATTERSON, for the use, etc., v. LYNDE |
Decision Date | 08 January 1883 |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
[Syllabus from page 519 intentionally omitted]
[Statement of Case on pages 519-520 intentionally omitted] C. M. Harris, for plaintiff in error.
Chas. M. Osborn, for defendant in error.
The only question we deem it necessary to consider in this case is whether a creditor of a corporation, formed and organized under the general laws of Oregon 'in relation to the formation of private corporations,' can maintain an action at law against a stockholder to recover, out of an unpaid balance of subscription to the capital stock, the debt due to him from the corporation. The constitution of Oregon, art. 11, § 3, provides that 'the stockholders of all corporations and joint-stock companies shall be liable for the indebtedness of said corporation to the amount of their stock subscribed and unpaid, and no more.'
Section 14 of the statute 'in relation to the formation of private corporations' is as follows:
Since this case was decided below, the supreme court of Oregon has passed on the same question, and in Bush v. Cartwright, 7 Or. 329, determined that the individual liability of stockholders for the indebtedness of the corporation is limited to the amount of their stock subscribed and unpaid, and that the remedy of the creditor to enforce this liability is in equity, where the rights of the corporation, the stockholder, and all the creditors can be adjusted in one suit. Of the correctness of this decision we have no doubt. The liability of the stock- holder is upon his subscription; that is to say, upon his obligation to contribute to the capital stock, which is a trust fund for the benefit of those to whom the corporation, as a corporation, becomes liable. Sawyer v. Hoag, 17 Wall. 620. The constitution of Oregon created no new right in this particular; it simply provided for the preservation of an old one. The liability under this provision is not to the creditors, but for the indebtedness. That is no more than the liability...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.
... ... Conn, 109 U.S ... 371, 380, 3 Sup.Ct. 263, 27 L.Ed. 966; Wright v ... McCormack, 17 Ohio St. 86, 95; Patterson v ... Wyomissing Mfg. Co., 40 Pa. 117; Appeal of Means, 85 Pa ... 75, 79; Thompson on Liability of Stockholders, Sec. 312), and ... in equity ... alike ( Pollard v. Bailey, 20 Wall. 520, 22 L.Ed ... 376; Terry v. Little, 101 U.S. 216, 25 L.Ed. 864; ... Patterson v. Lynde, 106 U.S. 519, 1 Sup.Ct. 432, 27 ... L.Ed. 265) ... In the ... year 1868 the Legislature of the state of Kansas, pursuant to ... the ... ...
-
Jones v. Mutual Fidelity Co.
...creditor to secure payment of his own debt to the exclusion of others. Sawyer v. Hoag, 17 Wall. 610, 622 (21 L.Ed. 731); Patterson v. Lynde, 106 U.S. 519 (27 L.Ed. 265); Johnson v. Waters, 111 U.S. 640, 674 (4 619, 28 L.Ed. 547). * * * The contest is upon the sufficiency in amount of the cr......
-
Compton v. Jesup
...448, or that between the liens of the creditors of the insolvent corporations in Sawyer v. Hoag, 17 Wall. 610, 622; Patterson v. Lynde, 106 U.S. 519, 1 Sup.Ct. 432; Johnson v. Waters, 111 U.S. 640, 644, 4 Sup.Ct. 619,-- and in all those cases, a suit for the benefit of the whole class of cr......
-
Reagan v. Midland Packing Co.
... ... 56, 62, 23 L.Ed. 220; ... Terry v. Tubman, 92 U.S. 156, 161, 23 L.Ed. 537; ... Hatch v. Dana, 101 U.S. 205, 25 L.Ed. 885; ... Patterson v. Lynde, 106 U.S. 519, 1 Sup.Ct. 432, 27 ... L.Ed. 265; George W. Signor Tie Co. v. Monett & S.W ... Const. Co. (D.C.) 198 F. 412; In re ... ...