Pattison & Bowns Inc. v. Twp. Of Saddle River ., 20.
Citation | 130 N.J.L. 177,32 A.2d 363 |
Decision Date | 13 May 1943 |
Docket Number | No. 20.,20. |
Parties | PATTISON & BOWNS, Inc., Respondent, v. TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE RIVER et al., Appellants. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Chandless, Weller & Kramer, of Hackensack, for appellants.
Hobart, Minard & Cooper, of Newark, for respondent.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Colie in the Supreme Court, reported at 129 N.J.L. 135, 28 A.2d 485.
For affirmance: Justices PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, and PORTER, and Judges DEAR, WELLS, HAGUE, and THOMPSON-8.
For reversal: The CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice HEHER and Judge RAFFERTY-3.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
General Elec. Co. v. City of Passaic
...52 A.2d 838 (Sup.Ct.1947); Pattison & Bowns, Inc., v. Saddle River Tp., 129 N.J.L. 135, 28 A.2d 485 (Sup.Ct.1942), affirmed 130 N.J.L. 177, 32 A.2d 363 (E. & A.1943); Halligan & McLellan, Inc., v. State Bd. of Tax Appeals, 122 N.J.L. 551, 6 A.2d 668 (Sup.Ct.1939); City of Newark v. Blanchar......
- Schwartz v. Essex County Bd. Of Taxation
- Wallace v. Del. River Ferry Co. Of N.J.