Paulk v. Sexton
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BELL, Justice. |
| Citation | Paulk v. Sexton, 203 Ga. 82, 45 S.E.2d 768 (Ga. 1947) |
| Decision Date | 14 November 1947 |
| Docket Number | 15935. |
| Parties | PAULK, Sheriff, v. SEXTON. |
Fact that applicant for habeas corpus had been arrested under a previous warrant and discharged therefrom on habeas corpus did not establish in subsequent habeas corpus proceeding that detention of applicant after subsequent arrest was unlawful where offense for which previous warrant was issued was different from that for which he was subsequently arrested. Ga.Code Ann. § 50-116(1, 6).
The exception is to an order releasing and discharging the applicant in a habeas corpus proceeding. Three criminal warrants were referred to in the evidence, all having been sworn out by H. T. Troup, Jr., against W. R Sexton, and issued by G. G. Meeks, a justice of the peace of Irwin County, Georgia: (1) Warrant dated March 13, 1947, for cheating and swindling, based on a check for $1350; (2) warrant dated May 15, 1947, for the 'offense of cheating and swindling, uttering a worthless check on Citizens Bank of Americus, Georgia, on the 3rd day of August, 1946;' (3) warrant dated May 15, 1947, for the 'offense of a felony as described in the Code, section 5-9914 on or about 13th day of November, 1946.' Only the two lastmentioned warrants are directly involved in the instant case, the applicant having been previously released from arrest under the warrant first mentioned.
The Code section referred to in the felony warrant provides 'Any person engaged, either on his own account or for others, in the business of buying cotton, corn, rice, crude turpentine, spirits of turpentine, rosin, pitch, tar, cattle hogs, sheep, goats, horses, pecans, peaches, apples watermelons, cantaloupes, and mules, or other products or chattels sold by planters and commission merchants on a cash sale, who shall buy such articles on sale from a planter or commission merchant for cash, and shall fail or refuse to pay for, and shall make way with or dispose of the same before he shall have paid therefor, shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary for not less than one year, nor more than five years.' Code, § 5-9914, Ga.L.1941, p. 337.
The present case comes to this court solely by a certified bill of exceptions, in which the following facts appear: On May 20, 1947, W. R. Sexton, through his attorney, presented to Honorable R. Eve, Judge of the Superior Court of Irwin County, a petition for the writ of habeas corpus, naming as respondent Tillman Paulk, sheriff of Irwin County. The petition alleged: 3. The cause or pretense of restraint is under a certain warrant of arrest issued in Irwin County by a justice of the peace. 4. Said restraint of W. R. Sexton 'is illegal, in that the offense on which the warrant was issued is bailable under the constitution of this State defining bailable offenses, and said W. R. Sexton has been twice arrested on the same charge as that named in the warrant, and has been once removed to Irwin County where restitution was made on the charge and the warrant was withdrawn; that on May 10, 1947, the said W. R. Sexton was discharged on a writ of habeas corpus by the Court of Ordinary of Harris County, Georgia; and the said W. R. Sexton was arrested by agents of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation on May 19, 1947, and removed to Atlanta, Georgia, and lodged in Fulton Tower without an opportunity to give bail on the said offense although bail was offered to the said agents of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.'
The judge passed an order requiring the defendant sheriff to produce the body of the applicant, together with the cause of his detention, on May 21, 1947.
The respondent filed an answer, admitting detention of the applicant, but denying the alleged illegality, the response being in part as follows:
the same justice of the peace, 'which charges the said W. R. Sexton with the offense of a misdemeanor.
The hearing was held on May 24, 1947. It is recited in the bill of exceptions:
On the hearing, the applicant introduced as witnesses in his own behalf H. T. Troup, Jr., the prosecutor, Tillman Paulk, sheriff of Irwin County, and H. V. Grantham, deputy sheriff. The applicant also testified, and introduced certain documentary evidence. It appeared from the evidence that respondent was holding the applicant under two warrants dated May 15, 1947, one for a misdemeanor and the other for a felony, as already described. The evidence also shows that Sexton resided in Harris County, but operated an abattoir in Americus. The warrant from which he was previously released on habeas corpus in Harris County was issued on March 13, 1947, being the warrant first mentioned in this statement.
It is deemed sufficient to set forth in detail only a portion of the testimony, as follows: H. T. Troup, Jr., who swore out the warrants, testified that he had known Sexton (the applicant) about three years and had done $75,000 to $100,000 business with him; that in July, 1946, he sold to Sexton livestock to the value of more than $7,000; that he drew a draft on him for the amount, and upon finding that the draft was 'coming back' went to see Sexton and took from him post-dated checks for the amount of the draft. Among these checks was one dated July 25, 1946, for $2071.40, and one dated August 1, 1946, for $2907.91. Payment of each was refused on account of insufficient funds, although the check dated July 25 was thereafter paid in full. In November, 1946, Troup again sold livestock to Sexton, drawing a draft on him for $825.63, which draft was several times returned unpaid, and on December 14 he drew another one for the same amount in lieu of the previous one. In February, 1947, Troup sold to Sexton other livestock to the amount of about $1300. Troup further testified: At this time, according to Troup's testimony, Sexton owed him, in addition to the $1350 check, the $825.63 draft, and a balance of $863 on the check dated August 3, 1946, both of which have been referred to, the check for $2071.40 dated July 25, 1946, having been paid by that time. Sexton was brought from the fail in Ocilla to the office of Troup's attorney, and there paid to Troup, partly in cash and partly in personal property, the sum of $1291 for credit on the $1350 check, and gave him a note for $1703, secured by a mortgage on the abattoir of Sexton in Americus; the $1703 representing all that was then due by Sexton to Troup.
In the early part of May, 1947, Sexton was again arrested, this time in Harris County, on the same warrant on which he had been arrested in Columbus. On May 10, he was released on habeas corpus proceedings by the ordinary of Harris County.
Thereafter, on May 15, 1947, Troup swore out the two warrants against Sexton, designated in the beginning of this statement as (2) and (3). Troup further testified: office and took out the warrant and left it in Judge Meeks' office. * * * I did deliver in November of last year a shipment of livestock in Irwin County, Georgia, to Mr. Sexton, amounting to this $800 and some odd dollars. He did not pay me for it at that time. I drew a draft on him for it. I understood that it was a cash transaction. I have never been paid that draft, and it is due. That is the basis of this warrant I took out before Judge Meeks. * * * He gave me a promissory note on it. * * * That was after he had gotten the livestock. * * * I would not have issued this warrant if Mr. Sexton had paid the mortgage and note on time. I was hoping Mr. Sexton wouldn't beat me.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Davis v. State
...not function "to determine the guilt or innocence of one accused of crime." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Paulk v. Sexton , 203 Ga. 82, 82 (2), 45 S.E.2d 768 (1947). Instead, "[a] writ of habeas corpus looks only to the lawfulness of the present confinement." Balkcom v. Hurst , 220 G......
-
Bush v. Chappell, 25406
...607(1), 4 S.E.2d 469; Sanders v. Aldredge, 189 Ga. 69(1), 5 S.E.2d 371; White v. George, 195 Ga. 465(1), 24 S.E.2d 787; Paulk v. Sexton, 203 Ga. 82(2), 45 S.E.2d 768; Buxton v. Brown, 222 Ga. 564(2), 150 S.E.2d The Habeas Corpus Act of 1967 (Ga.L.1967, pp. 835-839; Code Ann. Chapter 50-1) h......
-
Reid v. Perkerson
...of an application for habeas corpus, the only question to be determined by the court is the legality of the detention. Paulk v. Sexton, 203 Ga. 82, 45 S.E.2d 768, and citations. In the instant case, and for reasons stated above, the petition affirmatively shows a legal detention under one o......
-
Gill v. Decatur County
...before the most convenient and accessible judicial officer authorized to hear the cause. (Code § 27-208). It was held in Paulk v. Sexton, 203 Ga. 82(4), 45 S.E.2d 768, that an arresting officer has no authority to accept bond on a felony, although it has been held that a bond fixed and acce......
-
15 Court of Inquiry (Commitment Or Preliminary Hearing)
...the accused before a committing officer in the county wherein the offense was allegedly committed [OCGA 17-4-21, -25, -26; Paulk v. Sexton, 203 Ga. 82, 45 SE2d 768 (1947)]. 15.2 HEARING 15.21 Hearing - CHECKLIST 1. Has defendant received initial rights? (See 13.11 et seq.) 2. Has an indictm......
-
15 Court of Inquiry (Commitment Or Preliminary Hearing)
...the accused before a committing officer in the county wherein the offense was allegedly committed [OCGA 17-4-21, -25, -26; Paulk v. Sexton, 203 Ga. 82, 45 SE2d 768 (1947)]. 15.2 HEARING 15.21 Hearing - CHECKLIST 1. Has defendant received initial rights? (See 13.11 et seq.) 2. Has an indictm......
-
15 Court of Inquiry (Commitment or Preliminary Hearing)
...the accused before a committing officer in the county wherein the offense was allegedly committed [OCGA 17-4-21, -25, -26; Paulk v. Sexton, 203 Ga. 82, 45 SE2d 768 (1947)]. 15.2 HEARING 15.21 Hearing - CHECKLIST 1. Has the defendant received initial rights? (See 13.11 et seq.) 2. Has an ind......
-
15 Court of Inquiry (Commitment Or Preliminary Hearing)
...the accused before a committing officer in the county wherein the offense was allegedly committed [OCGA 17-4-21, -25, -26; Paulk v. Sexton, 203 Ga. 82, 45 SE2d 768 (1947)]. 15.2 HEARING 15.21 Hearing - CHECKLIST 1. Has defendant received initial rights? (See 13.11 et seq.) 2. Has an indictm......