Payne v. Kassab

Decision Date21 November 1973
PartiesMarion Woodward PAYNE et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jacob G. KASSAB, Individually and as Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, et al., Defendants.
CourtPennsylvania Commonwealth Court

F. Charles Petrillo, James F. Geddes, Jr., Wilkes-Barre, for plaintiffs.

Edward V. A. Kussy, Edward Hosey, Asst. Attys. Gen., Dept. of Transportation, Legal Bureau, Harrisburg, Chester B. Muroski, Asst. City Sol., Wilkes-Barre, for defendants.

Before BOWMAN, President Judge, and CRUMLISH, Jr., KRAMER, WILKINSON, MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT, JJ.

MENCER, Judge.

This equity action was initiated by several individual citizens of the City of Wilkes-Barre and a group of students attending Wilkes College in Wilkes-Barre. The named defendants include the Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, the City of Wilkes-Barre, and the Mayor and Councilmen of the City of Wilkes-Barre. The complaint filed seeks to enjoin the widening of portions of North and South River Streets in Wilkes-Barre.

Under the proposed plans, River Street would be widened to a forty-two-foot four-lane artery for a distance of approximately two-thirds of a mile. As a consequence, there would be an encroachment up to twelve feet at certain points and the taking of approximately one-half acre from lands known as the River Common (Common). Some large trees would be removed and a pedestrian walk would be eliminated.

The Common is presently comprised of about twenty-two acres and is essentially a park area. The original 'town plot' of Wilkes-Barre was laid out in 1770 by settlers of the Susquehanna Company who migrated to the Wyoming Valley from the Connecticut Colony. An area along the Susquehanna River was left open and became known as the River Common. During the past two centuries this land has been used for various public events, and historical monuments have been erected on the Common. In 1779 it was the site of encampment of the Clinton-Sullivan Expedition against warring elements of the Iroquois Nation.

In 1806 the Borough of Wilkes-Barre was incorporated and in 1807 the Pennsylvania Legislature dedicated the Common lands between South Street and Union Street for use as a public common. In 1846 the Legislature dedicated the land from Union Street northward to North Street as a public common. The Luzerne County Courthouse is located at the north end of the Common. 1 Kings and Wilkes Colleges are located on the east side of River Street, and students from those institutions use the park area of the Common.

The defendants filed answers, and an evidentiary hearing was held for four days in December 1972. At the completion of this hearing, certain of the defendants made a motion to dismiss. The parties have presented briefs and offered oral argument before this Court en banc. Upon consideration of the evidence, we make the following

Findings of Fact

1. The plaintiffs in this action in equity are Marion Woodward Payne, Sara Wolfe Bell, Lea M. Csala, Frances Phelps Waller, Rachael W. Gutman, Anthony J. Mussari, Barbara B. Albert, Magdalene Dysleski, Stella M. Moat, Elizabeth C. Miner, George Loveland, Esquire, Carolyn H. Reif, Judity L. Reishtein, Anthony J. Walaitis and Stella Walaitis, his wife, all of whom are residents and taxpayers in the City of Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, and its environs, and the Wilkes College Students' Committee for a Clean Environment, an unincorporated association of Wilkes College students comprising a school sanctioned club at Wilkes College in the City of Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.

2. The defendants are Jacob G. Kassab, individually and as Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, the City of Wilkes-Barre, and John B. McGlynn, Mayor, Marjorie Bart, Robert P. Brader, John V. Morris, Kenneth Remensnyder, Con Salwoski, and Joseph A. Williams, Councilmen of the City of Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.

3. The action is in the nature of a class action and was brought to enjoin the widening of portions of North and South River Streets in the City of Wilkes-Barre, in so far as the widening project proposed by the defendants encroaches upon lands known as the River Common of the City of Wilkes-Barre.

4. The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, also called PennDOT, under the Act of May 6, 1970, P.L. 356, §§ 11--18, as amended, 71 P.S. §§ 511--521, has certain powers and duties, including those formerly vested in the Pennsylvania Department of Highways, that encompass the planning and developing of transportation programs and the building, rebuilding, maintenance, widening and construction of State designated highways and rights of way.

5. The City of Wilkes-Barre is a third class city of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania duly incorporated pursuant to the Act of May 4, 1871, P.L. 539, of the Pennsylvania Legislature, and operating in accordance with the Third Class City Code, Act of June 23, 1931, P.L. 932, 53 P.S. § 35101 et seq., and under the provisions as well of the Optional Third Class City Charter Law, Act of July 15, 1957, P.L. 901, 53 P.S. § 41101 et seq., all as amended.

6. Dating from about the year 1770, when the original town of Wilkes-Barre was plotted out by settlers of the Susquehanna Company from Connecticut Colony, there has existed a tract of land bordering the Susquehanna River at Wilkes-Barre, consisting originally of approximately thirty-five acres and dedicated and used as a public common.

7. In 1799, while Wilkes-Barre was still a township, the Legislature of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in order to resolve conflicting claims between Pennsylvania and Connecticut settlers and to legalize titles to lands in the area involved, which included the then township of Wilkes-Barre, passed an act entitled 'An Act for offering compensation to the Pennsylvania Claimants of certain lands within the Seventeen Townships in the county of Luzerne, and for other purposes therein mentioned.' Act of April 4, 1799, recorded in Law Book Vol. VI, 394, 3 Sm.L. 362.

8. On January 2, 1804, commissioners appointed under the Compensation Act of April 4, 1799, and its supplements, made and returned a survey and issued a certificate to the 'township committed', at that time comprised of Matthias Hollenback, Lord Butler, and Jesse Fell, for two tracts of land in the township of Wilkes-Barre 'one thereof being a square in the town plot thereof and called the Centre Square and the other being the public common on the river bank,' and the latter embracing the entire river front from North Street to South Street; which two tracts contained about 'thirty-nine acres and forty-one perches, with the usual allowance of six percentum for roads.'

9. By the Act of March 17, 1806, recorded in Law Book Vol. X, 326, 4 Sm.L. 321, the Borough of Wilkes-Barre was incorporated by the Legislature of the Commonwealth.

10. By Section III, Act of April 9, 1807, recorded in Law Book Vol XI, 47, 4 Sm.L. 411 (a supplement to the Act of April 4, 1799), the Pennsylvania Legislature dedicated that portion of the River Common along the river front between South and Union Streets for use as a public common in the following manner:

'And be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid, That all that certain tract of land fronting the town-lots in the borough of Wilkes-Barre, on the bank of the Susquehanna, extending from the land of Jebez Fish, up the said river, one hundred and ninety-two rods, in a line parallel with the front line of the town-lots, be, and the same hereby is granted and set apart as a public common, and to remain as such for ever.'

11. By the Act of March 28, 1846, P.L. 196, § 6, the Pennsylvania Legislature provided:

'That all that certain tract of land, fronting the town lots in the borough of Wilkesbarre, on the bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the north side of Union street, up the said river, about sixty three rods to the north side of North Street, be and the same hereby is granted and set apart as a public common, and to be under the control and jurisdiction of the town council of said borough.'

12. By Articles of Agreement made February 8, 1869, and recorded in Luzerne County Deed Book 141 at page 276, and by Indenture made May 16, 1870, and recorded in Luzerne County Deed Book 141 at page 278, the Trustees of the Properties of the Borough and Township of Wilkes-Barre, successors to the former Township Committee, did convey the two tracts of land, being the Public Square and the River Common, to the Burgess and Town Council of the Borough of Wilkes-Barre.

13. By patent issued from the Land Department of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on January 10, 1870, and recorded in Luzerne County Deed Book 170 at page 240, and upon the payment of the sum of $207.39, the two tracts of land, namely the Public Square and Public Common (River Common), were granted to the Burgess and Town Council of the Borough of Wilkes-Barre.

14. The Borough of Wilkes-Barre became an incorporated city of the Commonweath of Pennsylvania pursuant to the Act of May 4, 1871, P.L. 539.

15. Prior to 1971, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Highways and/or PennDOT, commenced studies and planning for the widening of Legislative Route Spur 5, which encompasses North and South River Streets in the City of Wilkes-Barre between North and South Streets in that municipality, and on April 20, 1971, a public hearing was conducted with reference to the project at which only two proposals for widening were made to the public--one which would not encroach upon River Common lands on the westerly side of the street, and one which would encroach upon the River Common lands as well as lands of property owners on the easterly side of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
81 cases
  • In re Water Use Permit Applications
    • United States
    • Hawaii Supreme Court
    • 22 Agosto 2000
    ...words of another court, "[t]he result . . . is a controlled development of resources rather than no development." Payne v. Kassab, 11 Pa.Cmwlth. 14, 312 A.2d 86, 94 (1973),aff'd, 14 Pa.Cmwlth. 491, 323 A.2d 407 (1974), aff'd,468 Pa. 226, 361 A.2d 263 We have indicated a preference for accom......
  • Robinson Twp. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'n
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 19 Diciembre 2013
    ...in Payne, acting en banc and in its original jurisdiction, had dismissed the matter and entered a decree nisi. Payne v. Kassab, 11 Pa.Cmwlth. 14, 312 A.2d 86, 97 (1973). Notably, the court held that Section 27 was intended to allow “controlled development of resources rather than no develop......
  • Frederick v. Allegheny Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • 26 Octubre 2018
    ...the evident goal of promoting sustainable development." Id. at 958.The plurality in Robinson Township II criticized Payne v. Kassab , 11 Pa.Cmwlth. 14, 312 A.2d 86 (1973), affirmed , 468 Pa. 226, 361 A.2d 263 (1976), which established a three-part test to determine whether government action......
  • EAGLE ENVIRONMENTAL II, LP v. COM., DEP
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 27 Octubre 2005
    ...Constitution, known as the Environmental Amendment.7 Relying on the Commonwealth Court's decision in Payne v. Kassab, 11 Pa.Cmwlth. 14, 312 A.2d 86 (1973) ("Payne I") and this Court's affirmance of Payne I, 468 Pa. 226, 361 A.2d 263 (1976) ("Payne II") and subsequent cases, the EHB conclude......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
8 books & journal articles
  • Conclusion: Should There Be a Constitutional Right to a Clean/Healthy Environment?
    • United States
    • The Clean Water Act and the Constitution. Legal Structure and the Public's Right to a Clean and Healthy Environment Part II
    • 20 Abril 2009
    ...Merlin Myers Revocable Trust v. Yellowstone County, 53 P.3d 1268, 1271-71 (Mont. 2002). 132. Pa. Const. art. I, §27. 133. Payne v. Kassab, 312 A.2d 86, 94 (Pa. Commw. 1973), aff’d , 323 A.2d 407 (Pa. 1973); Commonwealth v. National Gettysburg Tower, Inc., 302 A.2d 886, 892, 3 ELR 20347 (Pa.......
  • Shoreline Armoring and the Public Trust Doctrine: Balancing Public and Private Interests as Seas Rise
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 46-1, January 2016
    • 1 Enero 2016
    ...and marine life, and which favorably afect the scenery and climate of the area. (quoting Marks , 491 P.2d at 380). 128. Payne v. Kassab, 312 A.2d 86, 93 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1973) (“he people have a right to . . . the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the envir......
  • It Only Hurts When I Use It: The Payne Test and Pennsylvania's Environmental Rights Amendment
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 46-7, July 2016
    • 1 Julio 2016
    ...338 (2015). This article provides an analysis of Pennsylvania court and administrative agency decisions in support of its conclusion. 4. 312 A.2d 86 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1973), af’d , 361 A.2d 263, 6 ELR 20796 (Pa. 1976). 46 ELR 10594 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REPORTER 7-2016 Copyright © 2016 Environmen......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The constitutional question to save the planet. The peoples' right to a healthy environment Part 4
    • 23 Abril 2021
    ...of Envtl. Quality , 988 P.2d 1236 (Mont. 1999). Oposa v. Factoran , G.R. No. 101083 (July 30, 1993). Payne v. Kassab , 11 Pa. Commw. 14, 312 A.2d 86 (1973); af’ d , 468 Pa. 226, 361 A.2d 263 (1976). Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. Commonwealth , 161 A.3d 911 (Pa. 2017). Rob......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT