Payne v. Kerns
| Docket Number | 116978 |
| Decision Date | 12 May 2020 |
In 2010, plaintiff-appellant James Payne pled nolo contendere to stalking in Case No. CF-2010-27 in Pittsburg County, Oklahoma. He received a five-year deferment with special rules and conditions of probation. He was required to have no contact with the stalking victim. In addition, Payne pled guilty to violating a protective order in many other cases filed in Pittsburg County related to the same victim and was sentenced to six months in the county jail. The sentences were to run concurrently. He received extra credits and was released...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Johnson v. CSAA Gen. Ins. Co.
...OK 56, ¶ 17, 473 P.3d 475.11 Martin v. Gray , 2016 OK 114, ¶ 5, 385 P.3d 64, 66 (rule stated for a motion to dismiss); Payne v. Kerns , 2020 OK 31, ¶ 10, 467 P.3d 659, 663 (Whether summary judgment is properly entered is a question of law reviewed de novo ; and in a de novo review the Court......
-
Base v. Devon Energy Prod. Co.
...propriety of the trial court's summary judgment is a question of law that this Court reviews de novo. Payne v. Kerns, 2020 P.3d 659, ¶ 10, 467 P.3d 659, 663 (citing Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22, 989 P.2d 448, 455). Thus, we have plenary, independent, and non-deferential authority to de......
-
City of Okla. City v. Balkman
...136 P.3d 630.27 Mitchell v. Meachum, 1988 OK 131, 770 P.2d 887.28 Hunt v. Rowton, 1930 OK 254, 143 Okla. 181, 288 P. 342.29 Payne v. Kerns, 2020 OK 31, 467 P.3d 659.30 Martin v. Jordan, 2006 OK 26, 137 P.3d 681.31 McMullin v. Dept. of Corrections, 1993 OK 132, 863 P.2d 1187.32 State ex. rel......
-
Brisco v. Gerard
...authority to determine whether the trial court erred in its application of the law and whether there is any genuine issue of material fact." Id. ¶9 Summary judgment will be affirmed only if the Court determines that there is no dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is en......
Get Started for Free
