Payne v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass'n, F.A., 90-1490
| Decision Date | 04 February 1991 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-1490,90-1490 |
| Citation | 924 F.2d 109 |
| Parties | 55 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 96, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,581, 18 Fed.R.Serv.3d 870 Ronald Dale PAYNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURITY SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, F.A., Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Nile J. Williamson, Peoria, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.
David B. Goroff, William J. McKenna, Jr., Hopkins & Sutter, Chicago, Ill., for defendant-appellee.
Before CUMMINGS, POSNER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges.
Security Savings and Loan (Security Savings) discharged plaintiff Ronald Payne from his position as Branch Manager and Loan Officer in February, 1985. Payne brought suit against Security Savings in district court, claiming that he was terminated because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 et seq. In February, 1989, a jury agreed. By agreement of the parties, the issue of damages was then submitted to the district court. But before the court could hold a hearing on damages, Security Savings was declared insolvent and closed by the Office of Thrift Supervision in August 1989. The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) became the receiver for Security Savings and proceeded to transfer through a purchase and assumption agreement most of Security Savings' assets and liabilities to another thrift, Security Federal Savings and Loan (Security Federal). Liability for the judgment Payne obtained against Security Savings, however, was not transferred to Security Federal.
In September 1989, apparently concerned that he would have trouble collecting a judgment against Security Savings or RTC, Payne sought to name Security Federal as a party-defendant in a motion to amend his complaint. Security Savings responded with a motion to substitute its Receiver, RTC, as the proper party-defendant. Before ruling on these motions, the district court held a hearing on damages. The court found that Payne had failed to mitigate his damages after January 1, 1987, and therefore denied him back pay for 1987, 1988, and 1989, as well as front pay. The court did award Payne back pay for 1985 and 1986, as well as attorney's fees and costs, totalling $66,395.92. Without expressly ruling on Payne's motion to amend his complaint, the court then ordered that final judgment be entered against RTC as Receiver for Security Savings.
Payne appeals, contending that the court erred in finding that he failed to mitigate damages after 1986 and in substituting RTC, rather than Security Federal, as defendant. We affirm.
Plaintiff's first argument on appeal is that the district court erred in reducing the damage award to reflect what it found was plaintiff's failure to seek substitute employment after January 1, 1987. The law governing mitigation of damages is clear: in order to recover lost wages for the period following his discharge, Payne must demonstrate that he unsuccessfully sought suitable or comparable employment with "reasonable diligence." Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC, 458 U.S. 219, 231, 102 S.Ct. 3057, 3065, 73 L.Ed.2d 721 (1982); see also Graefenhain v. Pabst Brewing Co., 870 F.2d 1198, 1202 (7th Cir.1989); Hunter v Allis Chalmers Corp., 797 F.2d 1417, 1427 (7th Cir.1986). Because the question of mitigation is a factual one, we will not overturn the district court's finding unless it was clearly erroneous. Hybert v. Hearst Corporation, 900 F.2d 1050, 1054 n. 7 (7th Cir.1990); Syvock v. Milwaukee Boiler Mfg. Co., 665 F.2d 149, 159-60 (7th Cir.1981).
Security Savings discharged Payne in February, 1985. The record indicates that in the year following his discharge, Payne's job search was earnest and extensive; he sent out a great many resumes and knocked on a great many doors in an effort to find employment in the financial services industry. However, the district court noted that Payne sent out "substantially all" of his resumes by the end of May 1986, and that by the beginning of 1987, his job search had slowed to a trickle. According to Payne's own court testimony, he contacted not more than a dozen banks in 1987 and ten banks in 1988 regarding possible employment. Payne testified in the damages hearing that he spent roughly eight to ten hours a week in 1987 answering newspaper advertisements, but his deposition testimony before trial suggests less effort. At his deposition, he stated that he looked for employment "two or three days a month" during 1987 and "[a] few hours a week, maybe a month" in 1988. Payne's efforts clearly waned after his substantial search in 1985 and 1986 proved unsuccessful. His discouragement is understandable, and his lack of success is regrettable, but his duty to mitigate did not evaporate in the face of his difficulties. On the basis of the evidence before us, we cannot say that the district...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Shoucair v. Brown University, C.A. No. PC96-2896 (RI 9/9/2004)
... ... regard as are professors, nor is the job security similar in the high tech industry. Shoucair also ... in the face of [such] difficulties." Payne v. Security Sav. & Loan Assoc. , ... F.A. , 924 ... ...
-
Saffer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
...by [the successor], FIRREA directs that [the receiver] is the proper successor to the liability....’ Payne v. Sec. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, F.A., 924 F.2d 109, 111–12 (7th Cir.1991). This allows the receiver to ‘absorb liabilities itself and guarantee potential purchasers that the assets they buy......
-
National Enterprises, Inc. v. Woods
...institutions. (Nashville Lodging Co. v. Resolution Trust Corp. (D.C.Cir.1995) 59 F.3d 236, 247, quoting Payne v. Security Sav. & Loan Assn. (7th Cir.1991) 924 F.2d 109, 111.) We see no reason to burden the sale or transfer of related loans once held by the same creditor and secured by the s......
-
Denesha v. Farmers Ins. Exchange
...to make an "honest, good faith effort" to minimize his damages by obtaining full-time employment. Brooks, 852 F.2d at 1065; see also Payne, 924 F.2d at 111. Though attempts to find work do not have to rise to the level of ambition exhibited by the plaintiff in Brooks, a plaintiff must make ......
-
Wrongful Discharge
...efforts to find other employment and reduce their damages in the event of wrongful termination. See Payne v. Sec. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, FA. , 924 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1991); see also Coleman v. City of Omaha , 714 F.2d 804 (8th Cir. 1983); Jackson v. Shell Oil Co. , 702 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1983);......
-
Wrongful Discharge
...efforts to find other employment and reduce their damages in the event of wrongful termination. See Payne v. Sec. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, FA. , 924 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1991); see also Coleman v. City of Omaha , 714 F.2d 804 (8th Cir. 1983); Jackson v. Shell Oil Co. , 702 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1983);......
-
Wrongful discharge
...efforts to find other employment and reduce their damages in the event of wrongful termination. See Payne v. Sec. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, FA. , 924 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1991); see also Coleman v. City of Omaha , 714 F.2d 804 (8th Cir. 1983); Jackson v. Shell Oil Co. , 702 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1983);......
-
Wrongful Discharge
...efforts to find other employment and reduce their damages in the event of wrongful termination. See Payne v. Sec. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, FA., 924 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1991); see also Coleman v. City of Omaha, 714 F.2d 804 (8th Cir. Jackson v. Shell Oil Co., 702 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1983); Prof’l Se......