Pea v. United States
Decision Date | 20 December 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 20433.,20433. |
Citation | 397 F.2d 627 |
Parties | Emanuel PEA, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Mr. Harold David Cohen, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. J. Laurent Scharff, Washington, D. C. (both appointed by this court) was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Edward T. Miller, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., Frank Q. Nebeker and Allan M. Palmer, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Robert Kenly Webster, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and McGOWAN and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.
Reargued En Banc January 17, 1968.
On Rehearing En Banc June 19, 1968.
This opinion considers the voluntariness of appellant's confession of murder.
His case is before us for the third time. On a 1960 indictment appellant was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death, but in 1962 this court vacated the judgment and remanded for a new trial because appellant had been represented by a fraudulent imposter-lawyer.1 A 1963 judgment of imprisonment for 15 years to life on a conviction of second degree murder was affirmed by this court,2 but in 1964 the Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with its opinion in Jackson v. Denno, decided that same day. 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908.
The evidentiary hearing on voluntariness of appellant's confession, given while he was in Sibley Hospital, was postponed at the request of defense counsel, who had to contact medical witnesses who had left the country. The trial judge was hospitalized at the time the hearing was held in 1966 and the case was transferred to another judge for disposition.
In Part I of this opinion we quote substantially the entire opinion of the District Judge rendered July 8, 1966, which presents background facts and concludes that the prosecution has shown appellant's confession to be voluntary. In Part II of this opinion we explain why in our view the District Court's ruling must be reversed for failure to apply requisite criteria of voluntariness. A further aspect of the case is reserved for en banc consideration.
The District Court's Opinion that Appellant's Confession Was Voluntary.
What follows is substantially the entire opinion of the District Judge:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Com. v. Paszko
...condition that left him "devoid of his normal will to protect himself and rendered indifferent to protect himself." Pea v. United States, 397 F.2d 627, 634 (D.C.Cir.1967). The defendant, in fact, asked for an attorney and terminated his conversation with police apparently concluding that it......
-
United States v. Schipani
...(1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 995, 87 S.Ct. 1312, 18 L.Ed.2d 341 (1967) (concurring opinion) (confession); Pea v. United States, 397 F.2d 627, 633, n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1968), (collecting cases in other jurisdictions; confession); United States v. Taglianetti, 274 F.Supp. 220, 226 (D.R.I.1967) (e......
-
Com. v. Tavares
...362 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 995, 87 S.Ct. 1312, 18 L.Ed.2d 341 (1967) (Leventhal, J., concurring). See Pea v. United States, 397 F.2d 627 (D.C.Cir.1967). Under our "humane practice" the initial screening by the judge is the "basic determination safeguarding the accused." Clif......
-
Lego v. Twomey 8212 5037
...doubt. Ralph v. Warden, 438 F.2d 786, 793 (CA4 1970), clarifying United States v. Inman, 352 F.2d 954 (CA4 1965); Pea v. United States, 130 U.S.App.D.C. 66, 397 F.2d 627 (1967); cf. United States v. Schipani, 289 F.Supp. 43 (E.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd, 414 F.2d 1262 (CA2 1969), cert. denied, 397 ......
-
Judicial integrity: a call for its re-emergence in the adjudication of criminal cases.
...denied sub nom., Persisco v. United States, 395 U.S. 911 (1969); Sanders v. Russell, 401 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1968); Pea v. United States, 397 F.2d 627, 637 (D.C. Cir. 1968) (rehearing en banc); ACF Indus., Inc. v. Guinn, 384 F.2d 15 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 949 (1968); Governm......