Pearson v. Hanson
Decision Date | 10 December 1907 |
Citation | 230 Ill. 610,82 N.E. 813 |
Parties | PEARSON v. HANSON et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cook County; G. A. Carpenter, Judge.
Suit between Anna Maria Pearson and Christian H. Hanson and others. From an adverse decree, said Pearson appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Wolseley & Barker (Henry W. Wolseley, of counsel), for appellant.
James A. Peterson, for appellees.
This is a bill filed to obtain a construction of the last will of Andrew Peterson. Only legal questions are involved. The will disposed of both real estate and personal property; hence the appeal is to this court. The testator died January 19, 1899, and his will, which was dated August 4, 1898, was admitted to probate February 23, 1899. The testator left neither widow nor lineal descendants. His nearest relatives and principal beneficiaries under his will were two nephews, Harold P. Pearson and James A. Peterson, and two nieces, Nina M. Pearson and Josephine Kaywood (Née Peterson). The only clauses of the will which are necessary to be considered in determining the questions involved are the following:
‘(1) To pay all my just debts and funeral expenses; and in this connection it is my desire that my remains be buried in my lot in Oakwood cemetery, next to those of my deceased beloved wife, Josephine E. Peterson; that a headstone similar to the one upon my wife's grave be erected upon my grave and that my name be inscribed upon the monument on the said lot; that my said trustee expend the necessary money for keeping in good order the graves of my said wife and of myself and also my said cemetery lot.
‘(2) To have, hold, manage, possess, collect, invest and re-invest, upon the advice and under the direction and control of my executors, their survivor or survivors, successor or successors, all of my said estate, real, personal or mixed; to collect the issues and profits thereof; to keep the real estate insured and in repairs.
‘(3) To pay out of said trust estate, as soon as my executors, their survivor or survivors, successor of successors, find that there is sufficient cash on hand in the said trust estate for such purpose the special bequests shall be paid in their alphabetical order.
* * *
‘(1) To have, hold, manage, possess, collect, invest and re-invest, upon the advice and upon the direction and control of my executors, their survivor or survivors, successor or successors, all of the said trust fund created by this third paragraph of this my last will and testament.
‘(2) To collect, invest and re-invest all the issues and profits upon the trust fund created by this third paragraph, such issues and profits to be added to this trust fund for its accumulation.
‘(3) At the expiration of ten (10) years from the distribution, as provided by paragraph 2 of this will, which will be equal to twenty (20) years after my death, I direct that the trust created by this third paragraph of my will shall be dissolved, and that the remainder of my estate shall be distributed as provided by paragraph 4 of this my last will and testament.
On April 23, 1906, Harold P. Pearson, one of the beneficiaries, died, leaving a will, dated July 28, 1898, devising all his property, real and personal, to his mother, with a devise over to his sister Nina Pearson in case his mother did not survive him. Harold P. Pearson having died before the first period of distribution under paragraph 2 of the will of Andrew Peterson, a question has arisen whether the share of Harold P. Pearson in the annual distribution of accumulations under clause 4 of paragraph 1, and his one-fourth part of the one-half of the corpus distributable at the end of 10 years under paragraph 2, and his one-fourth interest in the final distribution at the end of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. Menefee
......As said by the Supreme Court of Illinois, in Pearson v. Hanson, 230 Ill. 610, 82 N. E. 813: . "The legally expressed intention of the testator as found within the four corners of the ......
-
Fay v. Fay
......Scofield v. Olcott, supra; Knight v. Pottgieser, 176 Ill. 368, 52 N. E. 934;Pearson v. Hanson, 230 Ill. 610, 82 N. E. 813;Carter v. Carter, 234 Ill. 507, 85 N. E. 292;Thomas v. Thomas, 247 Ill. 543, 93 N. E. 344,139 Am. St. Rep. ......
-
Benson v. Greenville Nat. Exchange Bank
......477; Bouldin v. Miller, 87 Tex. 359, 28 S.W. 940; Frame v. Whitaker, 120 Tex. 53, 36 S.W.2d 149; Estes v. Estes, Tex.Com.App., 267 S.W. 709; Pearson v. Hanson, 230 Ill. 610, 82 N.E. 813; McFadden v. McFadden, 302 Ill. 504, 135 N.E. 31; Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, Vol. 1A, p. 444, Sec. 220; ......
-
Nicol v. Morton
......Carter v. Carter, supra; Pearson v. Hanson, 230 Ill. 610, 82 N. E. 813;Dee v. Dee, 212 Ill. 338, 72 N. E. 429;Scofield v. Olcott, 120 Ill. 362, 11 N. E. 351. In Easton v. Hall, 323 ......