Pearson v. State

Decision Date16 August 2022
Docket NumberED 109918
Citation649 S.W.3d 400 (Mem)
Parties Martez PEARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Nina McDonnell, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant.

Julia E. Rives, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and, Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Movant, Martez Pearson, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court's judgment denying Movant's Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT