Peerless Ins. Co. v. Associates Financial Services of America, Inc., 770056

Decision Date03 March 1978
Docket NumberNo. 770056,770056
Citation241 S.E.2d 792,218 Va. 876
PartiesPEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY v. ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC. Record
CourtVirginia Supreme Court

Albert D. Bugg, Jr., Richmond (Sands, Anderson & Marks, Richmond, on brief), for plaintiff in error.

Donald R. Skinker (Pribble & Skinker, Fredericksburg, on brief), for defendant in error.

Before I'ANSON, C. J., and CARRICO, HARRISON, COCHRAN, HARMAN and COMPTON, JJ.

HARMAN, Justice.

This action was instituted by Associates Financial Services of America, Inc. (Associates), the "loss payee" under an automobile insurance policy issued to Alvis Wayne Adair (Adair), against the insurer, Peerless Insurance Company (Peerless). After a bench trial, the trial court awarded judgment to Associates for $1500.04, the full amount of its claim, and Peerless appealed.

The facts have been stipulated. Adair was the owner of a 1973 Dodge automobile which was severely damaged in a collision with another vehicle on November 16, 1975. On the date of this accident, Adair was indebted to Associates for $1500.04 secured by a lien on the automobile in question. Prior to the accident the car had a fair retail value of $2,512.50. The vehicle was so badly damaged in the accident that it was not economically feasible to repair it, but it had a salvage value of $255.01. Adair made no payments on his indebtedness to Associates after the accident.

Peerless, on April 23, 1975, issued its policy with attached declarations (Part B) providing Adair with comprehensive coverage against physical loss or damage to the car between that date and October 23, 1975. Associates was a "loss payee" under the policy. The premium was paid by Adair for the initial term of six months, and both Adair and Associates were furnished with copies of the policy declarations and policy which contained the following typewritten endorsement:

"It is agreed that this policy shall expire as shown in Item Two of the Declarations, except that it may be continued in force for successive policy periods by the payment of the required renewal premium in advance of each such period and the acceptance of such premium by a duly authorized representative of the company.

"Each such policy period shall be for the declared number of calendar months, and each shall begin and expire at 12:01 a. m., standard time, at the address of the named insured. The premium shown in the policy is for the stated policy period. If renewed, the successive policy periods shall be six calendar months."

On September 26, 1975, Peerless issued and forwarded to Adair and Associates a renewal declarations sheet (Part B) of the policy for an additional term of six months, or from October 23, 1975, to April 23, 1976. The face of the declarations sheet shows the "amount due" for premiums to be "$124.00" and the "due date" to be "10/23/75". Since the renewal premium had not been received by October 23, 1975, Peerless, on that date, forwarded by first class mail to Adair, but not to Associates, a "Notice of Lapse" which reads as follows:

"Your policy terminated on the date due shown below. However, receipt of your payment by the Company postmarked within 10 days of the date due will assure continuation of coverage.

"Policy Number: 23P 88 27 19

"Date Due: 10/23/75

"Amount Due: $124.00

"Alvis Wayne Adair

"Rt. 3, Box 513B

"Fredricksburg, Va. 22401"

Adair did not respond to this notice and the renewal premium was never paid. On November 17, 1975, Peerless sent by first class mail addressed to both Adair and Associates a "Notice of Cancellation or Termination of Coverage" reading as follows:

"Peerless Insurance Company

"Keene, New Hampshire

"Hereby gives notice of the cancellation or termination of coverage of your interest under its Policy No. 23P 88 27 19 as of 12:01 A.M. 10/23/75."

Associates received this notice on November 21, 1975.

In its brief and at argument Associates conceded that the only real issue here is whether a loss payee under a policy providing comprehensive coverage against physical loss or damage is entitled to notice of termination of coverage for nonpayment of a renewal premium by the named insured. Associates says that such...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • McNair v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 5 Junio 2001
    ... ... the week before trial to obtain the services of counsel. It thus appears that 546 S.E.2d 760 ... ...
  • Fattaleh v. Commonwealth, Record No. 1625-05-3 (Va. App. 8/22/2006), Record No. 1625-05-3.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 22 Agosto 2006
    ... ... she wished to have the benefit of the services of a court-appointed attorney." Id. Therefore, ... ...
  • Blue v. Com.
    • United States
    • Virginia Court of Appeals
    • 15 Mayo 2007
    ... ... The trial judge told Blue to complete a financial statement, and if Blue qualified, he would ... The trial judge also offered Bolden the services of court-appointed counsel, which Bolden refused ... ...
  • Dairyland Ins. Co. v. Douthat
    • United States
    • Virginia Supreme Court
    • 4 Noviembre 1994
    ...the extent of recovery under the policy. See Eaton, 248 Va. at 430, 448 S.E.2d at 655; Peerless Ins. Co. v. Associates Fin. Servs. of America, Inc., 218 Va. 876, 879, 241 S.E.2d 792, 794 (1978). In the present case, Douthat does not argue that either insurer undertook in its policy to pay p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT