Pellitteri v. Barry-Wehmiller Co., BARRY-WEHMILLER

CourtCourt of Appeal of Missouri (US)
Writing for the CourtAppeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Robert H. Dierker, Jr.; PER CURIAM
Citation987 S.W.2d 516
PartiesVincent PELLITTERI, Plaintiff/Appellant, v.CO., et al., Defendant/Respondent.
Docket NumberBARRY-WEHMILLER,No. 74663,74663
Decision Date09 March 1999

Page 516

987 S.W.2d 516
Vincent PELLITTERI, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
BARRY-WEHMILLER CO., et al., Defendant/Respondent.
No. 74663.
Missouri Court of Appeals,
Eastern District,
Division Three.
March 9, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Robert H. Dierker, Jr., Judge.

Gerald Leon Warren, Clayton, for plaintiff/appellant.

Harry B. Wilson, David L. Schenberg, Husch & Eppenberger, LLC, St. Louis, for defendant/respondent.

Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Pellitteri, plaintiff, appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment against him in his action for retaliatory discharge against defendant, Jetstream Systems, Inc. (Jetstream), a subsidiary of defendant Barry-Wehmiller Co. (Wehmiller) (collectively defendants). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

To continue reading

Request your trial
39 cases
  • Collins v. Hertenstein, WD 59562.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • September 3, 2002
    ...for appeal. "`It is not the function of the appellate court to serve as advocate for any party to an appeal.'" Shochet v. Allen, 987 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Mo.App.1999) (quoting Thummel v. King, 570 S.W.2d 679, 686 (Mo. banc 1978)). "As such, we have no duty to search the transcript or record to ......
  • Cohen v. Cohen, 58810
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • April 23, 2002
    ...omitted)). "'It is not the function of the appellate court to serve as advocate for any party to an appeal.'" Shochet v. Allen, 987 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Mo. App. 1999) (quoting Thummel v. King, 570 S.W.2d 679, 686 (Mo. banc 1978)). "As such, we have no duty to search the transcript or record to......
  • Cohen v. Cohen, WD 58810.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • April 23, 2002
    ...omitted)). "`It is not the function of the appellate court to serve as advocate for any party to an appeal.'" Shochet v. Allen, 987 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Mo.App.1999) (quoting Thummel v. King, 570 S.W.2d 679, 686 (Mo. banc 1978)). "As such, we have no duty to search the transcript or record to d......
  • Rosehill Gardens Inc. v. Luttrell, WD 59489.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • January 29, 2002
    ...(citations omitted). "`It is not the function of the appellate court to serve as advocate for any party to an appeal.'" Shochet v. Allen, 987 S.W.2d 516, 518 (Mo.App.1999) (quoting Thummel v. King, 570 S.W.2d 679, 686 (Mo. banc 1978)). Thus, "[i]t is not the job of this court to make the ap......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT