Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Pena v. Lindley

Document Justia Case Summary Cited authorities 76 Cited in 64 Precedent Map Related
Docket Number15-15449
Decision Date03 August 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
52 cases
  • Fouts v. Bonta
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • September 22, 2021
    ...restrictions is sufficient to conclude that government regulation of a billy has long been accepted by the public.54 Pena v. Lindley , 898 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 2018), said, " ‘longstanding, accepted regulations’ may come from the early-twentieth century and need not trace their roots back to ......
  • Duncan v. Becerra
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • March 29, 2019
    ...an individual right to possess a "lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense.’ " Pena v. Lindley , 898 F.3d 969, 975 (9th Cir. 2018), pet'n for cert. filed (1/3/19) (quoting Heller , 554 U.S. at 635, 128 S.Ct. 2783 ). "The Court also wrote that the amendme......
  • Jones v. Bonta
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • May 11, 2022
    ...that the laws neither implicated the core Second Amendment right nor severely burdened that right. Id. at 1328 (citing Pena v. Lindley , 898 F.3d 969, 977 (9th Cir. 2018) ). The district court bolstered its conclusion by noting that young adults could "receive otherwise prohibited firearms ......
  • Hirschfeld v. Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco & Explosives
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 13, 2021
    ...a legislative judgment, not evidence in a criminal trial" or even an agency's record in an administrative proceeding. Pena v. Lindley , 898 F.3d 969, 979 (9th Cir. 2018) (explaining the proper application of intermediate scrutiny to a Second Amendment challenge). When Congress enacts a stat......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Do Courts Change Politics? Heller and the Limits of Policy Feedback Effects
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 69-5, 2020
    • Invalid date
    ...Law 1-85. Id.52. Id. at 140.53. Heller, 554 U.S. at 635.54. U.S. Const. amend. II.55. Heller, 554 U.S. at 606-11.56. See Pena v. Lindley, 898 F.3d 969, 975 (9th Cir. 2018) (holding that the court's Second Amendment analysis is "is framed by a two-step inquiry established in Heller"); Eric R......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT