Penn v. Fleet Bank

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationPenn v. Fleet Bank, 12 AD3d 584, 785 N.Y.S.2d 107, 2004 NY Slip Op 8673 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Decision Date22 November 2004
Docket Number2003-05672.
PartiesJUDITH PENN, Appellant, v. FLEET BANK et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

To impose liability upon the defendants for the plaintiff's fall, there must be evidence tending to show the existence of a dangerous or defective condition and that the defendants either created the condition or had actual or constructive notice of it and failed to remedy it within a reasonable time (see Christopher v New York City Tr. Auth., 300 AD2d 336 [2002]; Brown-Phifer v Cross County Mall Multiplex, 282 AD2d 564 [2001]; see also Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836 [1986]). The defendants sustained their initial burdens of demonstrating their entitlement to summary judgment by submitting the deposition testimony of the plaintiff, which revealed that she did not know what caused her foot to become caught when she fell in the automated teller machine vestibule area of the defendant bank (see Christopher v New York City Tr. Auth., supra). The plaintiff merely testified at her deposition that after she fell she noticed that a portion of a mat was turned up. It is just as likely under these facts that the mat was caused to flip up as the result of the plaintiff's fall and was not a pre-existing condition. In the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • DeEscobar v. Westland S. Shore Mall, L.P.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 21, 2018
    ... ... which could have been caused by a sudden ... misstep or loss of balance (see Penn v Fleet ... Bank, 12 A.D.3d 584, 785 N.Y.S.2d 107 [2d Dept 2004], ... Iv denied 5 ... ...
  • Giannotti v. Hudson Valley Fed. Credit Union
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 18, 2015
    ...Services, LLC, 91 A.D.3d 865, 865, 936 N.Y.S.2d 687 ; Drago v. DeLuccio, 79 A.D.3d 966, 966–967, 913 N.Y.S.2d 747 ; Penn v. Fleet Bank, 12 A.D.3d 584, 584, 785 N.Y.S.2d 107 ). The defendant also submitted the deposition testimony and an affidavit from the employee the plaintiff was followin......
  • Gonzalez v. Natick N.Y. Freeport Realty Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 10, 2012
    ...fall, there must be evidence tending to show, inter alia, the existence of a dangerous or defective condition (see Penn v. Fleet Bank, 12 A.D.3d 584, 785 N.Y.S.2d 107; Christopher v. New York City Tr. Auth., 300 A.D.2d 336, 752 N.Y.S.2d 76; Brown–Phifer v. Cross County Mall Multiplex, 282 A......
  • Leary v. Leisure Glen Home Owners Ass'n Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 29, 2011
    ...Stores, LLC, 55 A.D.3d 527, 528, 866 N.Y.S.2d 681; Rubin v. Cryder House, 39 A.D.3d 840, 840, 834 N.Y.S.2d 316; Penn v. Fleet Bank, 12 A.D.3d 584, 584, 785 N.Y.S.2d 107). “A defendant has constructive notice of a defect when the defect is visible and apparent, and has existed for a sufficie......
  • Get Started for Free