Penn v. Rinaldi

Decision Date01 October 1963
Docket NumberDocket 28122.,No. 9,9
Citation323 F.2d 913
PartiesJames Gordon PENN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clara RINALDI, doing business under the firm name and style of Queens Truck Rental, Defendant, and Mack Trucks Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Joseph K. Guerin, New York City (Myers & Guerin, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

John B. Shields, New York City (John L. Quinlan, Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief), for defendant.

David S. Konheim, New York City (Konheim & Halpern, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In open court we affirm the judgments of the District Court for the Southern District of New York which dismissed the complaint against the defendants Clara Rinaldi, doing business under the firm name and style of Queens Truck Rental, and against Mack Trucks, Inc. because of a prior judgment dismissing a similar complaint pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. The effect of such a dismissal, prescribed by the Rule itself, is a matter of federal law, Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333 (2 Cir., 1962)

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Spangler v. CIR
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • October 16, 1963
  • La Societe Anonyme des Parfums LeGalion v. Jean Patou, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • April 9, 1974
    ...based on diversity of citizenship or federal question jurisdiction, Kern v. Hettinger, 303 F.2d 333, 340 (2 Cir. 1962); Penn v. Rinaldi, 323 F.2d 913 (2 Cir. 1963). Applying Rule 41(b) in this case presents several special problems, however. First, the district judge appeared at trial to be......
  • Saylor v. Lindsley
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 13, 1967
    ...81 S. Ct. at 545. Accordingly, a dismissal for failure to prosecute bars a subsequent suit on the same cause of action. Penn v. Rinaldi, 323 F.2d 913 (2d Cir. 1963). This rule, moreover, is applied when the suit is a class action, the courts recognizing that defendants, as well as plaintiff......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT