Penn v. Starks, S82-525.
Decision Date | 29 December 1983 |
Docket Number | No. S82-525.,S82-525. |
Citation | 575 F. Supp. 1240 |
Parties | William Earl PENN, Jr., Plaintiff, v. William A. STARKS, Doctor, Defendant. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana |
William Earl Penn, Jr., pro se.
David A. Nowak, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, Ind., for defendant.
This case was filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by an inmate at the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City, Indiana, against a physician. Jurisdiction of this court over the claim is predicated on a federal civil rights question under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343. The matter is presently before this court on defendant's motion for summary judgment.
The defendant filed his motion for summary judgment with supporting memorandum, affidavit, and exhibits, on September 29, 1983. On October 7, 1983, this court entered the following order:
Notwithstanding the above admonition, plaintiff has yet to file any response to defendant's motion.
This court further notes that, at the pretrial conference held in this matter on May 27, 1983, at the Indiana State Prison, plaintiff was specifically admonished by the court to file his response to a motion for summary judgment no later than November 1, 1983. Thus, and despite two warnings from this court, one oral, the other in writing, plaintiff has taken no action in this case, and has filed no pleadings, since the filing of the complaint more than one year ago.1
Turning now to the merits of defendant's motion, this court notes that the defendant's pleadings in support of said motion, being uncontroverted, must be accepted as true. F.R.Civ.P. 56(e). The facts are as follows.
The defendant, William A. Starks is a consulting orthopedic surgeon to the Indiana State Prison at Michigan City, Indiana. His duties include examining and treating those inmates suffering orthopedic problems that are referred to him by prison staff physicians. The referred inmates are examined and treated at the prison during scheduled clinics.
On July 26, 1982, the defendant, pursuant to a normal referral from prison staff physician Dr. Weldon Cooke, examined inmate William Penn. On July 26, 1982 Dr. Starks had access to, and had received the following:
As a result of his examination of July 26, 1982 and of the above information, including X-rays, Dr. Starks performed an arthroscopy on inmate Penn's left knee on August 3, 1982. As a result of the arthroscopy Dr. Starks concluded that a surgical operation to inmate Penn's left knee would be required. This surgery was performed at Memorial Hospital in Michigan City on August 19, 1982, at which time the colateral ligament was repaired in a pinning process, and two torn medial meniscus were extracted.
Following this operation Dr. Starks prescribed all necessary medication which would have been administered by Memorial Hospital Staff.
Upon inmate Penn's return to I.S.P. the course of events becomes absurd. On September 11, 1982, inmate Penn, on his own volition, removed his post-operative cast applied by Dr. Starks to his left knee. The cast was reapplied. On September 12, 1982 inmate Penn slipped while taking a bath, allegedly split his cast, and again on his own volition removed the cast. On September 13, 1982, contrary to all physician's instructions, inmate Penn refused to use crutches and bore his weight on his left knee, and on September 14, 1982, allegedly became involved with another inmate at the prison hospital during which he was kicked in the knee. On September 15, 1982, Dr. Cooke made an entry in the sick call records that inmate Penn refused all medical instruction and advice. On September 16 and 17, 1982, inmate Penn returned to the hospital and complained of pain in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Richardson v. Penfold
...basis as an alternative). Burris v. Kirkpatrick, 573 F.Supp. 1084 (1983). Lockert v. Faulkner, 574 F.Supp. 606 (1983). Penn v. Starks, 575 F.Supp. 1240 (1983). Huddleston v. Duckworth, 97 F.R.D. 512 Williamson v. State of Indiana, Department of Correction, 577 F.Supp. 983 (1984) (4 cases de......
-
Felders v. Miller
...S.Ct. 668, 88 L.Ed.2d 677 (1986), and Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 106 S.Ct. 662, 88 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986). See also Penn v. Starks, 575 F.Supp. 1240 (N.D.Ind.1983). The elaborate medical evidence in the record of this case clearly establishes beyond any dispute that this plaintiff does ......
-
Zingmond v. Harger
...§ 1983, or for a violation of the Eighth Amendment, Risner v. Duckworth, 562 F.Supp. 378, 380-382 (N.D.Ind. 1983); Penn v. Starks, 575 F.Supp. 1240, 1254 (N.D.Ind.1983). He has not sued the jail physician who ordered his insulin stopped. The jail staff must obey and follow the orders of the......
-
Brownlow v. Chavez, IP 93-3 C.
...have held that prisoners' medical malpractice claims do not state a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim. See e.g., Penn v. Starks, 575 F.Supp. 1240 (N.D.Ind.1983). In Penn, a prisoner disagreed with the type and quality of medical services he received. The district court entered summary judgm......