Pennell v. HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION
Decision Date | 22 December 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 1482.,1482. |
Citation | 21 F. Supp. 497 |
Parties | PENNELL v. HOME OWNERS' LOAN CORPORATION. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Maine |
Charles J. Nichols, of Portland, Me., for plaintiff.
Simon W. Moulton, of Standish, Me., and Edgar F. Corliss, of Bridgton, Me., for defendant.
This is an action founded on tort, removed from the state court and heard on a motion to dismiss.
The defendant foreclosed a mortgage held by it on a dwelling house and took possession of the premises, as it had a right to do under its contract and under the laws of Maine.
The plaintiff, a third party, claiming in her writ to have suffered injury due to negligence on the part of the defendant in its handling of the property, states a case under which it is apparent that she would be entitled to recover if the defendant were an individual or an ordinary private corporation organized under the laws of the state; but it is claimed by the defendant, in support of its motion to dismiss, that defendant is not subject to suit, because it is an agent of the government of the United States.
It should be noted in the first place that the negligence complained of is that of the agent itself, for which an agent is liable on his own account. It is the same point considered in Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 258 U.S. 549, 42 S.Ct. 386, 388, 66 L.Ed. 762, in which Mr. Justice Holmes said: .
The mere fact that the defendant is an agent of the government does not protect it from suit.
Is the defendant immune from suit, generally, for any reason growing out of its organization and purposes or connection with the government, as claimed by counsel? I think not, both by reason and authority, unless, possibly, it should appear that the proceeding would directly interfere with the defendant's function as a federal instrumentality; as was suggested, but left unanswered, in Federal Land Bank v. Priddy, 295 U.S. 229, 237, 55 S.Ct. 705, 709, 79 L.Ed. 1408.
The Home Owners' Loan Corporation was created by authority of the Act of June, 13, 1933, as amended, 12 U.S.C.A. § 1461 et seq., to engage in the business of loaning money and refinancing mortgages on real estate, a business that private corporations and individuals commonly engage in. The principal purpose of the act, as was recited therein, was to provide emergency relief with respect to home mortgage indebtedness, to refinance home mortgages, and to extend relief to owners of homes occupied by those who were unable to amortize their debts elsewhere. Profits were to be paid to the government which owned all the stock. But the fact of stock ownership by the government does not change the character of the corporation or render it immune from suit. U. S. v. Strang, 254 U.S. 491, 41 S.Ct. 165, 65 L.Ed. 368; Panama Ry. Co. v. Curran, 5 Cir., 256 F. 768.
The general proposition of the defendant is that it is an agent of the sovereign and that an action against the agent is, in effect, an action against the sovereign, and that the sovereign cannot be sued without its consent. But the sovereign may waive...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Caplan
...160 S.W.2d 754 349 Mo. 353 Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. Eleanor L. Caplan, Ephrim Caplan, and James B. Killian, Appellants No. 37828Supreme Court of ... other business corporation. Pennell v. H. O. L. C., ... 21 F.Supp. 497; Herman v. H. O. L. C., 200 A. 742; ... Central Market v ... ...
-
Casper v. Regional Agr. Credit Corporation
...and garnishment. Gill v. Reese, 53 Ohio App. 134, 4 N.E.2d 273; Central Market v. King, 132 Neb. 380, 272 N.W. 244; Pennell v. Home Owners' Loan Corp., 21 F.Supp. 497, U. S. District Court, District of Maine, decided December 22, 1937. The Panama Railway, although a government instrumentali......
-
Casper v. Regional Agricultural Credit Corporation of Minneapolis
... ... supra , the rule was applied to the fleet ... corporation. In National Home for Disabled Volunteer ... Soldiers v. Parrish, 229 U.S. 494, 33 S.Ct. 944, 57 ... L.Ed. 1296, ... 134, 4 N.E.2d 273; Central Market, Inc. v ... King, 132 Neb. 380, 272 N.W. 244; Pennell v. Home ... Owners' Loan Corp. 21 F.Supp. 497. The Panama ... Railway, although a government ... ...
-
Walker v. HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION
...§§ 1461-1468; Langer v. U. S., 8 Cir., 76 F.2d 817; Ballaine v. Alaska Northern R. Co., 9 Cir., 259 F. 183. 2 Pennell v. Home Owners' Loan Corp., D.C., 21 F.Supp. 497; Herman v. Home Owners Loan Corp., 120 N.J.L. 437, 200 A. 742, July 8, 1938; Casper v. Regional Agr. Credit Corp., Minn., 27......