Pennoyer v. Wadhams
| Decision Date | 06 January 1891 |
| Citation | Pennoyer v. Wadhams, 20 Or. 274, 25 P. 720 (Or. 1891) |
| Parties | PENNOYER et al. v. WADHAMS et al. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Clatsop county; FRANK J. TAYLOR, Judge.
This is a suit in equity to foreclose a mortgage of $4,000, executed by Truman P. Powers in his life-time, upon a tract of land containing 80 acres adjoining Upper Astoria, and six blocks in Upper Astoria.The complaint is in the usual form.The defendant Wadhams answers separately, alleging that he is the holder in trust of the legal title to a certain portion of the real estate described in the mortgage for the use and benefit of the First Presbyterian Church of Upper Astoria, in accordance with the last will and testament of said Powers and asking that defendant Leinenweber's property be first sold.The defendantMary H. Leinenweber also files an answer in which she denies the allegations of Wadhams' answer and alleges that she is the sole heir and residuary legatee of Powers.Upon the issues thus made between defendants Wadhams and Leinenweber the cause was tried, which resulted in a decree in favor of defendant Leinenweber, from which decree Wadhams brings this appeal.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
A testator devised certain real estate to trustees for the purpose of having erected on a designated portion thereof a Presbyterian Church, to be known as the 'First Presbyterian Church of Upper Astoria,' for the use of the society of said church, and of a parsonage for the use of the pastor in charge thereof; for the purpose of carrying out this trust, authorized and empowered the trustees to sell any and all of the land devised, except that portion on which the church and parsonage were to be built, and directed that the proceeds of such sale be applied in the erection and furnishing of said church and parsonage, and, after such church and parsonage should be erected and furnished, the trust to wholly cease and determine in trustees as to said church, parsonage, and furniture as well as to any unsold property, or unexpended proceeds of sales, and to vest in and be carried on by, the board of trustees of the First Presbyterian Church of Upper Astoria and their successors in office, in trust 'for the purpose of advancing and propagating the Christian religion, through the agency of the Presbyterian Church. 'Held a charitable trust valid against the testator's heirs, although there was no Presbyterian Church organization or society in Upper Astoria, at time of testator's death.
H.B. Nicholas, for appellant.
Raleigh Stott, for respondent.
BEAN J., (after stating the facts as above.)
On March 12, 1883, Truman P. Powers executed his last will and testament, which, among other devises and bequests, contained the following:
At the time of Power's death in July, 1883, there was no First Presbyterian Church, or any Presbyterian Church organization association, or society in Upper Astoria, nor has any such church been organized or established since his death.The contention of respondent is that the devise to Wadhams and Leinenweber was a private trust, and not a public charity, and, there being no certain specified beneficiaries in existence at the time of the testator's death, is void.The requisites of a valid private trust, and one for a charitable use, are materially different.In the former there must not only be a certain trustee who holds the legal title, but a certain specified cestui que trust, clearly identified, or made capable of identification, by the terms of the instrument creating the trust; while it is an essential feature of the latter that the beneficiaries are uncertain, a class of persons described in some general language, often fluctuating, changing in their individual members, and partaking of a quasi public character.Indeed, it is said a public charity begins where uncertainty in the recipient begins.2 Pom.Eq.Jur. § 1018;2 Perry, Trusts, § 687;Raley v. Umatilla Co.,15 Or. 172, 13 P. 890.When the object and purposes for which a trust is intended to be created is once determined to be charitable, very different rules from those that are applied in administering and establishing private trusts will be applied in order to give effect to the intention of the donor, and establish the charity.In a private trust, if the cestuis que trustent are so uncertain, or are so incapable of taking, that they cannot be identified, or cannot, by legal or equitable proceedings, claim the benefit conferred upon them, the gift will fail, and revert to the donor, or his heirs; but, if a gift is made for a public charitable purpose, it is immaterial that the cestuis que trustent are indefinite or uncertain, or that the trustee is uncertain or incapable of taking.Courts of equity look with favor upon all such trusts, and endeavor to carry them into effect, if it can be done consistently with the rules of law.With regard to the origin and extent of the equitable...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
E. Henry Wemme Co. v. Selling
... ... Pennoyer v. Wadhams, 20 Or. 274, 25 P. 720, 11 L. R. A. 210; In re John's Will, 30 Or. 494, 47 P. 341, 36 L. R. A. 242; Vidal v. Girard, 2 How. 127, 11 ... ...
-
Geiger v. Simpson Methodist-Episcopal Church of Minneapolis
... ... Clogan, 171 Ill. 462, 49 N.E. 527, ... 40 L.R.A. 730, 63 A.S.R. 241; Carter v. Whitcomb, 74 ... N.H. 482, 69 A. 779, 17 L.R.A.(N.S.) 733; Pennoyer v ... Wadhams, 20 Or. 274, 25 P. 720, 11 L.R.A. 210; ... Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Mott, 7 Paige ... (N.Y.) 77, 32 Am. D. 613; ... ...
-
In re Johnson's Estate
...and embraces objects and purposes which are not charitable. The will cannot be sustained as creating a public charity. Pennoyer v. Wadhams, 20 Or. 274, 25 P. 720, 11 L. A. 210; Van Syckel v. Johnson, 80 N. J. Eq. 117, 70 A. 657; Chamberlain v. Stearns, 111 Mass. 267, 268; Adye v. Smith, 44 ......
-
Small's Estate, In re
...of religious doctrines. Of such character is a devise or bequest for the advancement of the Christian religion. Pennoyer v. Wadhams, 20 Or. 274, 25 p. 720, 11 L.R.A. 210; Re Hood (1931) 1 Ch. (Eng.) 240, 73 A.L.R. 1354-C.A.; Annotations; 4 Ann.Cas. 1139; Ann.Cas.1914D, 451, 45.; 2 Am.Law In......